Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Lake Highlands Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113013008 · Dallas, TX · pop 3,046 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

How risky is Lake Highlands in Dallas for landlords? Census tract 48113013008 scores 4.6/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #63,355 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,502 a month against an average household income of $127,841 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 31% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 21% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,127
Renter share30.9%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$127,841

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Lake Highlands
Low
Within parent city
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#308 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within county
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#497 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#4,987 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8859, -96.7236 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lake Highlands scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,502 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Lake Highlands compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lake Highlands risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 013008Dallas: 2.72.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 513Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 6.36%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.1%Peak (2004)
  • 41Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130130082000: 42 filings (9.03/100 renter HHs)2001: 34 filings (7.31/100 renter HHs)2002: 53 filings (11.40/100 renter HHs)2003: 37 filings (7.96/100 renter HHs)2004: 61 filings (13.12/100 renter HHs)2005: 12 filings (2.72/100 renter HHs)2006: 46 filings (10.43/100 renter HHs)2007: 21 filings (4.76/100 renter HHs)2008: 23 filings (5.22/100 renter HHs)2009: 17 filings (3.85/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (4.78/100 renter HHs)2011: 23 filings (5.75/100 renter HHs)2012: 19 filings (4.75/100 renter HHs)2013: 27 filings (6.75/100 renter HHs)2014: 9 filings (2.25/100 renter HHs)2015: 12 filings (3.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 14 filings (2.92/100 renter HHs)2017: 41 filings (8.56/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 411Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.08×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (3.59× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (2.99× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-10-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2021-12-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2022-02-01: 10 filings (5.99× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (2.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 9 filings (3.86× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (4.19× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 11 filings (2.54× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (2.25× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 32 filings (10.67× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 14 filings (10.53× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (2.58× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (3.59× baseline)2024-07-01: 20 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (1.85× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 8 filings (6.02× baseline)2024-12-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (3.59× baseline)2025-03-01: 8 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (2.58× baseline)2025-05-01: 9 filings (2.70× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-10-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lake Highlands. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lake Highlands

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dallas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Dallas County average of 5.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 46th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 513 eviction filings here over 18 tracked years, with about 6.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.1% of renter households in 2004.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113013008

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113013008?

Census tract 48113013008 in the Lake Highlands neighborhood scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113013008?

Median gross rent is $1,502/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113013008?

3.5% of residents in tract 48113013008 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,046.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113013008?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 75th, minority 58th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 48113013008 considered part of Lake Highlands?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113013008 fall within Lake Highlands (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113013008?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 513 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113013008 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.36% of renter households, peaking at 13.1% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113013008 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.08× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113013008 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113013008 scores 2.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Dallas at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related