Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

The Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113019302 · Dallas, TX · pop 5,752 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

48113019302 is a census tract in the The Village area of University Park, TX. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Severe burden reaches 39%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 10% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units901
Renter share24.2%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$214,821

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 13 tracts In The Village
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#461 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8446, -96.7805 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Village scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$2,476 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
5.3

How The Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 019302Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 56Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 0.84%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.0%Peak (2005)
  • 1Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130193022000: 1 filings (0.11/100 renter HHs)2001: 6 filings (0.65/100 renter HHs)2002: 3 filings (0.32/100 renter HHs)2003: 4 filings (0.43/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (0.54/100 renter HHs)2005: 9 filings (1.99/100 renter HHs)2006: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 3 filings (0.66/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)2009: 3 filings (0.66/100 renter HHs)2010: 3 filings (0.84/100 renter HHs)2011: 4 filings (1.62/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (0.81/100 renter HHs)2013: 5 filings (2.02/100 renter HHs)2014: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (0.30/100 renter HHs)2017: 1 filings (0.30/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 10Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.67×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Village

The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.2/10. 60% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Dallas County average of 47.9%. The voucher gap is 31.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. At $2,476 a month, rents run 24% under what the rest of University Park commands.

Court records carry 56 eviction filings across 15 observed years. It sits 0.8 points below the Dallas County average of 3.8.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 2.0% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 0.8% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019302?

Census tract 48113019302 in the The Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019302?

Median gross rent is $2,476/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019302?

7.9% of residents in tract 48113019302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,752.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 2th, minority 45th, housing 46th.
Q5

Is tract 48113019302 considered part of The Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113019302 fall within The Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019302?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 56 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 48113019302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.84% of renter households, peaking at 2.0% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113019302 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113019302 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113019302 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48113019302 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related