Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

The Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113007906 · Dallas, TX · pop 2,155 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 48113007906 sits in the The Village area of Dallas eviction risk, TX, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Average gross rent is $2,413, 64% above the Dallas average.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 19% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,046
Renter share41.4%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$147,738

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 13 tracts In The Village
Low
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#328 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within county
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#537 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8603, -96.7757 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Village scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$2,413 rent vs county FMR
7.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How The Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 007906Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 69Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 1.03%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.6%Peak (2001)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130079062000: 4 filings (1.07/100 renter HHs)2001: 6 filings (1.60/100 renter HHs)2002: 3 filings (0.80/100 renter HHs)2003: 6 filings (1.60/100 renter HHs)2004: 5 filings (1.33/100 renter HHs)2005: 6 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2006: 6 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2007: 4 filings (1.02/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2009: 1 filings (0.25/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (1.37/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (1.38/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.23/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (0.23/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (1.15/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (0.23/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (0.66/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 22Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.85×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Village

27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. The voucher gap is 28.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10.

53% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Dallas County average of 47.9%. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 69 filings here across 17 tracked years.

It sits 0.8 points below the Dallas County average of 3.8. Filings peaked in 2001 at 1.6% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 1.0% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Social vulnerability reads 3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113007906

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113007906?

Census tract 48113007906 in the The Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113007906?

Median gross rent is $2,413/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113007906?

10.3% of residents in tract 48113007906 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,155.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113007906?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 45th, minority 18th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 48113007906 considered part of The Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113007906 fall within The Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113007906?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 69 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48113007906 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.03% of renter households, peaking at 1.6% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113007906 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.85× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113007906 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113007906 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48113007906 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related