Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

SpringPark Eviction Risk: Lower , Richardson

Tract 48113019031 · Dallas, TX · pop 5,192 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

48113019031 is a census tract in the SpringPark area of Garland, TX. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 5,192 residents. 28% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 14% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units2,181
Renter share25.2%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$107,870

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In SpringPark
Moderate
Within parent city
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#45 of 51 tracts In Richardson
Very Low
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#492 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richardson and the region

Centroid at 32.9745, -96.6794 · click any tract to drill in

Why SpringPark scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richardson
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,863 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richardson
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richardson
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richardson
2.5

How SpringPark compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
SpringPark risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 019031Richardson: 4.24.2Richardsonparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 495Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 6.69%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.9%Peak (2007)
  • 13Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130190312000: 12 filings (3.06/100 renter HHs)2001: 11 filings (2.80/100 renter HHs)2002: 16 filings (4.08/100 renter HHs)2003: 31 filings (7.90/100 renter HHs)2004: 25 filings (6.37/100 renter HHs)2005: 18 filings (4.46/100 renter HHs)2006: 37 filings (9.17/100 renter HHs)2007: 52 filings (12.88/100 renter HHs)2008: 27 filings (6.69/100 renter HHs)2009: 32 filings (7.93/100 renter HHs)2010: 41 filings (10.33/100 renter HHs)2011: 46 filings (10.31/100 renter HHs)2012: 30 filings (6.73/100 renter HHs)2013: 41 filings (9.19/100 renter HHs)2014: 29 filings (6.50/100 renter HHs)2015: 14 filings (3.14/100 renter HHs)2016: 20 filings (5.35/100 renter HHs)2017: 13 filings (3.48/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 86Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.26×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (2.99× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (5.97× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within SpringPark. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in SpringPark

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.2/10.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Court records carry 495 eviction filings across 18 observed years.

Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. Average gross rent is $1,863, 14% above the Garland average. Filings peaked in 2007 at 12.9% of renter households.

In a typical year about 6.7% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 46% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $107,870.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019031

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019031?

Census tract 48113019031 in the SpringPark neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019031?

Median gross rent is $1,863/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019031?

4.6% of residents in tract 48113019031 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,192.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019031?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 20th, minority 63th, housing 20th.
Q5

Is tract 48113019031 considered part of SpringPark?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113019031 fall within SpringPark (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019031?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 495 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113019031 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.69% of renter households, peaking at 12.9% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113019031 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.26× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113019031 compare to Richardson overall?

Tract 48113019031 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Richardson at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richardson eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richardson

Top eight tracts in Richardson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related