Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

SpringPark Eviction Risk: Lower , Richardson

Tract 48113019037 · Dallas, TX · pop 3,117 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 3.2/10, tract 48113019037 in the SpringPark area of Richardson, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,117. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 13% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,027
Renter share20.2%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$92,138

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In SpringPark
Very High
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 33 tracts In Richardson
Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#370 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Moderate
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4,107 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richardson and the region

Centroid at 32.9658, -96.6901 · click any tract to drill in

Why SpringPark scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richardson
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,450 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richardson
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richardson
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richardson
5.8

How SpringPark compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
SpringPark risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 019037Richardson: 4.24.2Richardsonparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 162Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 5.36%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.2%Peak (2008)
  • 4Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130190372000: 12 filings (6.27/100 renter HHs)2001: 7 filings (3.66/100 renter HHs)2002: 8 filings (4.18/100 renter HHs)2003: 5 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)2004: 10 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2005: 6 filings (3.59/100 renter HHs)2006: 16 filings (9.56/100 renter HHs)2007: 13 filings (7.77/100 renter HHs)2008: 17 filings (10.16/100 renter HHs)2009: 5 filings (2.99/100 renter HHs)2010: 8 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2011: 8 filings (4.68/100 renter HHs)2012: 12 filings (7.02/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (5.85/100 renter HHs)2014: 6 filings (3.51/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (2.34/100 renter HHs)2016: 11 filings (9.32/100 renter HHs)2017: 4 filings (3.39/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 67% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 30Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.25×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within SpringPark. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in SpringPark

Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. around a third of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Dallas County average of 47.9%.

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

At $1,450 a month, rents run 22% under what the rest of Richardson commands. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 162 filings here across 18 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2008 at 10.2% of renter households.

In a typical year about 5.4% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #63,308 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. It tracks the Dallas County average of 3.8 closely. Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $92,138.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019037

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019037?

Census tract 48113019037 in the SpringPark neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019037?

Median gross rent is $1,450/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019037?

6.9% of residents in tract 48113019037 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,117.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019037?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 36th, minority 59th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 48113019037 considered part of SpringPark?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113019037 fall within SpringPark (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019037?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 162 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113019037 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.36% of renter households, peaking at 10.2% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48113019037 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.25× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48113019037 compare to Richardson overall?

Tract 48113019037 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Richardson at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richardson eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richardson

Top eight tracts in Richardson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related