Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Richardson Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48113019040 · Dallas, TX · pop 8,018 · 64% of tract blocks fall in Richardson

For landlords sizing up Richardson in Dallas County, census tract 48113019040 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of $1/10. That is riskier than about 74% of US census tracts.

46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,707 a month against an average household income of $81,826 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 78% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 42% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units3,069
Renter share78.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate12.9%
Median income$81,826

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#7 of 33 tracts In Richardson
High
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#424 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#4,301 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#53,267 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richardson and the region

Centroid at 32.9323, -96.7387 · click any tract to drill in

Why Richardson scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richardson
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
12.9% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,707 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richardson
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richardson
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richardson
5.8

How Richardson compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Richardson risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 019040Richardson: 2.32.3Richardsonparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,534Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 4.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.2%Peak (2017)
  • 181Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130190402000: 13 filings (0.86/100 renter HHs)2001: 24 filings (1.58/100 renter HHs)2002: 44 filings (2.90/100 renter HHs)2003: 36 filings (2.37/100 renter HHs)2004: 74 filings (4.88/100 renter HHs)2005: 66 filings (3.90/100 renter HHs)2006: 74 filings (4.38/100 renter HHs)2007: 30 filings (1.77/100 renter HHs)2008: 85 filings (5.03/100 renter HHs)2009: 95 filings (5.62/100 renter HHs)2010: 96 filings (4.72/100 renter HHs)2011: 104 filings (4.95/100 renter HHs)2012: 74 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)2013: 115 filings (5.47/100 renter HHs)2014: 171 filings (8.14/100 renter HHs)2015: 120 filings (5.71/100 renter HHs)2016: 132 filings (5.95/100 renter HHs)2017: 181 filings (8.16/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 1,292% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,225Total filings 2020-21
  • 15.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 17.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.89×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 22 filings (1.02× baseline)2020-02-01: 19 filings (1.21× baseline)2020-03-01: 18 filings (1.59× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 7 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-08-01: 9 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-10-01: 6 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-11-01: 12 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-01-01: 12 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-02-01: 6 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-03-01: 16 filings (1.41× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (0.41× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-06-01: 12 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-07-01: 9 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-08-01: 18 filings (0.76× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-11-01: 10 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-12-01: 17 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-01-01: 22 filings (1.02× baseline)2022-02-01: 22 filings (1.40× baseline)2022-03-01: 16 filings (1.41× baseline)2022-04-01: 14 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 23 filings (1.21× baseline)2022-07-01: 41 filings (1.73× baseline)2022-08-01: 36 filings (1.52× baseline)2022-09-01: 34 filings (1.59× baseline)2022-10-01: 29 filings (1.34× baseline)2022-11-01: 31 filings (1.48× baseline)2022-12-01: 21 filings (1.03× baseline)2023-01-01: 19 filings (0.88× baseline)2023-02-01: 22 filings (1.40× baseline)2023-03-01: 23 filings (2.03× baseline)2023-04-01: 25 filings (2.03× baseline)2023-05-01: 29 filings (1.58× baseline)2023-06-01: 24 filings (1.26× baseline)2023-07-01: 29 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-08-01: 34 filings (1.44× baseline)2023-09-01: 28 filings (1.31× baseline)2023-10-01: 38 filings (1.75× baseline)2023-11-01: 14 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-01-01: 15 filings (0.69× baseline)2024-02-01: 23 filings (1.47× baseline)2024-03-01: 18 filings (1.59× baseline)2024-04-01: 9 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-05-01: 21 filings (1.15× baseline)2024-06-01: 19 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 16 filings (0.68× baseline)2024-08-01: 12 filings (0.51× baseline)2024-09-01: 12 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-10-01: 13 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-11-01: 13 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-12-01: 7 filings (0.34× baseline)2025-01-01: 12 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-02-01: 30 filings (1.91× baseline)2025-03-01: 21 filings (1.85× baseline)2025-04-01: 12 filings (0.97× baseline)2025-05-01: 14 filings (0.76× baseline)2025-06-01: 13 filings (0.68× baseline)2025-07-01: 19 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-08-01: 13 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-09-01: 8 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-10-01: 15 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-11-01: 10 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (0.30× baseline)2026-01-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Richardson

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richardson eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Dallas County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.89x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 79th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113019040

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113019040?

Census tract 48113019040 in Richardson scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113019040?

Median gross rent is $1,707/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113019040?

12.9% of residents in tract 48113019040 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,018.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113019040?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 49th, minority 84th, housing 82th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113019040?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,534 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113019040 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.44% of renter households, peaking at 8.2% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113019040 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.89× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113019040 compare to Richardson overall?

Tract 48113019040 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Richardson at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richardson eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richardson

Top eight tracts in Richardson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related