Skip to content
Sugar Land, Texas eviction risk overview
Ranked #1,799 of 1,865 nationally

Sugar Land, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Fort Bend County · Population 110,016

In 2026
Risk score
1.8
VERY LOW

34th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average1.8 Now1.8
10 5 1976 · score 1.7 1977 · score 1.7 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.3 1981 · score 1.3 1982 · score 1.4 1983 · score 1.3 1984 · score 1.3 1985 · score 1.3 1986 · score 1.3 1987 · score 1.3 1988 · score 1.4 1989 · score 1.4 1990 · score 1.4 1991 · score 1.4 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.7 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.8 1999 · score 1.8 2000 · score 1.4 2001 · score 1.4 2002 · score 1.5 2003 · score 1.4 2004 · score 1.5 2005 · score 1.5 2006 · score 1.5 2007 · score 1.5 2008 · score 1.8 2009 · score 1.9 2010 · score 1.9 2011 · score 1.9 2012 · score 1.7 2013 · score 1.8 2014 · score 1.8 2015 · score 1.8 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.4 2020 · score 2.8 2021 · score 2.8 2022 · score 2.8 2023 · score 2.8 2024 · score 2.5 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 1.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.0 Regional 3.5 State 2.0 Economic 3.5 Supply 3.5 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.5 Tenant 1.5 Housing 2.0 1.8 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +1.6% (2024)
    3.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.5
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    5.1% poverty · 4.5% unemp.
    3.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,957 average · 19.7% renters
    3.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    30.9% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    26 days filing → judgment
    2.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    19.7% renters
    1.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Land and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Sugar Land compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Fort Bend County
Very Low
#27 of 27 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileBottomTop
#27 of 27 cities in Fort Bend County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Low
#1304 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 29th percentileBottomTop
#1304 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Sugar Land risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Sugar Land: 1.81.8Sugar LandThis cityCounty: 3.03.0Countyavg in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.8
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 26d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,957/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $853-$3,683 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 19.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 110,016 residents, 19.7% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3 and 3.5 (Dem margin +1.6% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.5, housing court bias 2, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.5. Supply constraint: 3.5. The numbers behind those: 5.1% poverty, 4.5% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Sugar Land sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Pasadena, TX · 27d · ~$2.3k all-in ($85/day) · score 2.4 Pasadena Pearland, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($85/day) · score 1.6 Pearland The Woodlands, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($85/day) · score 1.8 The Woodlands League City, TX · 27d · ~$2.0k all-in ($74/day) · score 2 League City Atascocita, TX · 23d · ~$2.1k all-in ($93/day) · score 3.4 Atascocita Baytown, TX · 23d · ~$2.2k all-in ($95/day) · score 3.8 Baytown Missouri City, TX · 27d · ~$2.4k all-in ($90/day) · score 3.3 Missouri City Spring, TX · 25d · ~$2.3k all-in ($92/day) · score 3.6 Spring Texas City, TX · 26d · ~$2.1k all-in ($80/day) · score 2.4 Texas City Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Sugar Land
Sugar Land · 26d · ~$2.3k all-in ($87/day) · score 1.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Sugar Land, TX

Landlording in Sugar Land, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.8/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Sugar Land is a city of 110,016 residents where 19.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 30.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,957/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Sugar Land eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Sugar Land closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Sugar Land's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Sugar Land runs $853 to $3,683 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $1,957/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1.5/10 in Sugar Land, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Sugar Land: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,683 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Sugar Land

Trap · 19.7%
19.7% renter share against 110,016 residents produces roughly 21,717 rental occupants in Sugar Land. Fort Bend County voted D 10.6% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can get a tenant out for non-payment in Sugar Land?

The fastest route involves immediate action. Issue the 3-day notice on day 1. File suit on day 4. You might get a hearing within 10-14 days, and if you win, a writ of possession could be issued 5-6 days after judgment. So, potentially around 2-3 weeks, but the average is 26 days.
Q2

Can I just change the locks if a tenant doesn't pay rent?

No, absolutely not. That's an illegal self-help eviction in Texas. You must go through the court process. Doing so could open you up to lawsuits from the tenant for damages. Stick to the legal eviction process outlined in Tex. Prop. Code.
Q3

Is rent control a risk in Sugar Land?

No. Texas has a statewide ban on rent control. The rent-control-risk sub-score for Sugar Land is 1/10, meaning it's extremely low. You won't face local rent control ordinances here. Learn more about Texas rent control rules.
Q4

What if the tenant leaves personal property behind after an eviction?

You must follow specific procedures under Texas law for abandoned property. Generally, you need to store it and send a notice to the tenant's last known address. If they don't claim it within a certain period (usually 30 days), you can dispose of it or sell it. Document everything.
Q5

Do I need a lawyer for every eviction?

Not necessarily for straightforward non-payment cases where the tenant doesn't dispute anything. However, if the tenant hires a lawyer, raises defenses, or you have any doubt about the process, hiring your own attorney is a smart move. The cost of a lawyer is often less than the cost of a botched eviction.
Q6

Are there any specific tenant protections in Sugar Land beyond state law?

No. Sugar Land does not have additional tenant protections beyond what is established at the state level. Texas law applies uniformly across the state. You can review general Texas tenant protections for more details.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.8/10 places Sugar Land in the 34th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.