Skip to content
Fannett, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,654 residents

Fannett, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Jefferson County · Population 1,654

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

46th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.7 Average2.1 Now2.2
2.6 1.7 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.1 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.7 1988 · score 1.7 1989 · score 1.7 1990 · score 1.7 1991 · score 1.8 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 1.9 1997 · score 1.9 1998 · score 1.9 1999 · score 1.9 2000 · score 1.8 2001 · score 1.9 2002 · score 2.0 2003 · score 2.0 2004 · score 2.0 2005 · score 1.9 2006 · score 1.9 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.0 2009 · score 2.2 2010 · score 2.3 2011 · score 2.3 2012 · score 2.1 2013 · score 2.0 2014 · score 2.0 2015 · score 2.0 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.2 2018 · score 2.2 2019 · score 2.2 2020 · score 2.6 2021 · score 2.5 2022 · score 2.4 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.3 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.4 Regional 5.4 State 1.5 Economic 6.1 Supply 3.1 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.1 Tenant 3.1 Housing 1.0 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +8.9% (2024)
    5.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.4
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    14.5% poverty · 3.8% unemp.
    6.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $768 average · 11.3% renters
    3.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    15.7% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    25 days filing → judgment
    1.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    11.3% renters
    3.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fannett and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Fannett compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Jefferson County
Low
#10 of 13 cities
Rank in county, 25th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 13 cities in Jefferson County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Moderate
#1071 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#1071 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Fannett risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Fannett: 2.22.2FannettThis cityCounty: 2.72.7Countyavg in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 25d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $768/mo. A contested eviction takes 25 days and costs $1,016–$3,997 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 11.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,654 residents, 11.3% rent. 16% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 14.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.4 and 5.4 (GOP margin +8.9% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.1, housing court bias 1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.1. Supply constraint: 3.1. The numbers behind those: 14.5% poverty, 3.8% unemployment, 16% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Fannett sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Beaumont, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.9 Beaumont Baytown, TX · 23d · ~$2.2k all-in ($95/day) · score 2.8 Baytown Port Arthur, TX · 24d · ~$2.4k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.8 Port Arthur Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 2.7 Dallas Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 2.9 Austin Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.6 Fort Worth El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 3.1 El Paso Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.6 Arlington Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Fannett
Fannett · 25d · ~$2.5k all-in ($100/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Fannett, TX

Landlording in Fannett, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Fannett is a city of 1,654 residents where 11.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 15.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $768/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Fannett eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Fannett closes 25 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Fannett's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Fannett runs $1,016 to $3,997 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 25 days of typical timeline and $768/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.1/10 in Fannett, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Fannett: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,997 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Fannett

Trap · PROPERTY CODE CHAPTER 24
Compare Fannett to nearby cities in Jefferson County via the related-cities grid below. Each municipality scores separately on the same nine sub-factors. State context: Property Code Chapter 24.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Fannett for something other than non-payment?

Yes. Texas allows "no-cause" termination with 30 days' notice for month-to-month leases. For a fixed-term lease, you generally need a lease violation (e.g., unauthorized pets, property damage, illegal activity) as "just cause." The process is similar, but the initial notice period might be different based on your lease and the violation. There is no statewide just-cause requirement in Texas, meaning you don't need a specific reason beyond a lease violation or proper notice for a month-to-month tenant.

Q2

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Fannett?

You are not legally required to have an attorney for a Justice Court eviction in Texas. Many landlords handle them themselves. However, if the tenant hires a lawyer, or if the case is complex, involves significant damages, or you just want to ensure everything is done perfectly and quickly, hiring an attorney is highly recommended. It can save you time and money in the long run by avoiding procedural errors.

Q3

What if my Fannett tenant leaves belongings behind after an eviction?

In Texas, after a lawful lockout, you must allow the tenant reasonable access to retrieve their essential personal property. You can't just toss their stuff on the curb. However, what constitutes "reasonable access" can be tricky. It's best to consult with a local attorney or the constable's office about specific procedures for handling abandoned property to avoid liability.

Q4

Can I turn off utilities if my Fannett tenant doesn't pay rent?

Absolutely not. Turning off utilities (water, electricity, gas) or changing locks to prevent access before a lawful lockout is illegal in Texas and can result in significant penalties. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Self-help evictions are a major mistake that can cost you far more than a proper eviction.

Q5

Are there rent control laws in Fannett, TX?

No. Texas has a statewide ban on rent control. This means cities and counties, including Fannett and Jefferson County, cannot implement rent control ordinances. You are generally free to set rent prices as the market dictates, subject to your lease agreement terms for existing tenants. For more information, see our Texas rent control rules.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places Fannett in the 46th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.