Skip to content
Garner, Texas eviction risk overview
City brief · 493 residents

Garner, TX Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Parker County · Population 493

In 2026
Risk score
1.8
VERY LOW

34th percentile, Texas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average2.3 Now1.8
10 5 1976 · score 1.6 1977 · score 1.6 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.4 1981 · score 1.4 1982 · score 1.5 1983 · score 1.4 1984 · score 1.4 1985 · score 1.4 1986 · score 1.4 1987 · score 1.4 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.8 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.8 1999 · score 1.9 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.5 2002 · score 2.6 2003 · score 2.6 2004 · score 2.6 2005 · score 2.6 2006 · score 2.6 2007 · score 2.6 2008 · score 2.8 2009 · score 2.8 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.8 2013 · score 2.8 2014 · score 2.8 2015 · score 2.8 2016 · score 3.0 2017 · score 3.1 2018 · score 3.1 2019 · score 3.2 2020 · score 3.5 2021 · score 3.5 2022 · score 3.5 2023 · score 3.5 2024 · score 2.6 2025 · score 3.3 2026 · score 1.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.6 Regional 2.6 State 1.5 Economic 3.9 Supply 5.9 Rent Control 1.1 Eviction 1.4 Tenant 3.0 Housing 1.5 1.8 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +66.4% (2024)
    2.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.6
  3. State political climate
    Texas legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    1.5% poverty · 4.1% unemp.
    3.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,672 average · 12.3% renters
    5.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    10.5% of income on rent
    1.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    28 days filing → judgment
    1.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    12.3% renters
    3.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Garner and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Garner compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Parker County
Low
#11 of 16 cities
Rank in county, 33rd percentileBottomTop
#11 of 16 cities in Parker County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Texas
Low
#1257 of 1,841 cities
Rank in state, 32nd percentileBottomTop
#1257 of 1,841 cities in Texas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Garner risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Garner: 1.81.8GarnerThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.8
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 28d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,672/mo. A contested eviction takes 28 days and costs $1,121-$3,268 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 12.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 493 residents, 12.3% rent. 11% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 1.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.6 and 2.6 (GOP margin +66.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.4, housing court bias 1.5, rent-control risk 1.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.9. Supply constraint: 5.9. The numbers behind those: 1.5% poverty, 4.1% unemployment, 11% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Garner sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Fort Worth, TX · 28d · ~$2.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Fort Worth North Richland Hills, TX · 25d · ~$2.3k all-in ($93/day) · score 4 North Richland Hills Burleson, TX · 26d · ~$2.2k all-in ($85/day) · score 2.6 Burleson Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston San Antonio, TX · 25d · ~$2.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 2.8 San Antonio Dallas, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($89/day) · score 3.2 Dallas Austin, TX · 24d · ~$2.2k all-in ($92/day) · score 3.6 Austin El Paso, TX · 24d · ~$2.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 2.5 El Paso Arlington, TX · 25d · ~$2.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 2.7 Arlington Corpus Christi, TX · 26d · ~$2.6k all-in ($98/day) · score 2.3 Corpus Christi Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Garner
Garner · 28d · ~$2.2k all-in ($78/day) · score 1.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Garner, TX

Landlording in Garner, Texas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.8/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Garner is a city of 493 residents where 12.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 10.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,672/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Garner eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Garner closes 28 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Garner's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Garner runs $1,121 to $3,268 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 28 days of typical timeline and $1,672/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3/10 in Garner, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Texas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Garner: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Texas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,268 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Garner

Trap · 1.5/10
For landlords, the 3.3/10 score is most actionable when combined with Parker County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 1.5/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the biggest risk for Garner landlords?

Even with a low overall risk score of 3.3/10, the biggest sub-score risk for Garner is "supply constraint" at 5.9/10. This means there might be limited housing options, which can make it harder for tenants to find alternative housing if evicted, potentially prolonging a contentious situation. However, the low tenant organizing strength ($1/10) and housing court bias (1.5/10) still keep overall risk low.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Garner for any reason?

No, not for "any" reason. Texas is a "no statewide just-cause" state, meaning you don't need a specific tenant fault to not renew a lease. However, during the lease term, you generally need a lease violation (like non-payment or breach of lease terms) to evict. You cannot evict based on discriminatory reasons or in retaliation for a tenant exercising their legal rights. See Texas tenant protections for more information.

Q3

How long does it typically take to get a tenant out in Garner, TX?

From the initial 3-day notice to the final sheriff lockout, the typical eviction timeline in Garner is about 28 days. This assumes no major delays or appeals from the tenant. If a tenant appeals, the process can extend significantly.

Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Garner?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for an eviction case in Justice Court in Texas. Many landlords represent themselves, especially in straightforward non-payment cases. However, if the tenant contests the eviction, raises defenses, or you are unsure about the legal procedures, hiring an attorney is highly recommended to avoid costly mistakes. An attorney can also help ensure all notices are served correctly.

Q5

What's the best way to avoid evictions in the first place?

Thorough tenant screening is your absolute best defense. Always verify income, check credit and background, and contact previous landlords. A clear, comprehensive lease agreement that outlines all tenant responsibilities and consequences for violations is also essential. Good communication with your tenants can often resolve minor issues before they escalate to eviction territory.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.8/10 places Garner in the 34th percentile of Texas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.