Skip to content
Amalga, Utah eviction risk overview
City brief · 511 residents

Amalga, UT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Cache County · Population 511

In 2026
Risk score
2
VERY LOW

49th percentile, Utah.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average1.6 Now2
2.2 1.3 1976 · score 1.7 1977 · score 1.7 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.7 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 1.7 1989 · score 1.3 1990 · score 1.4 1991 · score 1.4 1992 · score 1.4 1993 · score 1.4 1994 · score 1.4 1995 · score 1.4 1996 · score 1.4 1997 · score 1.4 1998 · score 1.4 1999 · score 1.4 2000 · score 1.4 2001 · score 1.4 2002 · score 1.5 2003 · score 1.5 2004 · score 1.4 2005 · score 1.4 2006 · score 1.3 2007 · score 1.3 2008 · score 1.4 2009 · score 1.7 2010 · score 1.8 2011 · score 1.7 2012 · score 1.5 2013 · score 1.5 2014 · score 1.5 2015 · score 1.5 2016 · score 1.9 2017 · score 1.9 2018 · score 2.0 2019 · score 2.0 2020 · score 2.2 2021 · score 2.0 2022 · score 2.0 2023 · score 2.0 2024 · score 1.9 2025 · score 2.0 2026 · score 2.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 3.8 State 1.9 Economic 2.6 Supply 7.5 Rent Control 7.1 Eviction 2.3 Tenant 5.6 Housing 4.4 2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +34.4% (2024)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.8
  3. State political climate
    Utah legislature & governorship
    1.9
  4. Economic stress
    0.8% poverty · 1.3% unemp.
    2.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,120 average · 29.7% renters
    7.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.0% of income on rent
    7.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    22 days filing → judgment
    2.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    29.7% renters
    5.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Amalga and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Amalga compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cache County
Elevated
#11 of 33 cities
Rank in county, 69th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 33 cities in Cache County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Utah
Moderate
#173 of 333 cities
Rank in state, 48th percentileLowHigh
#173 of 333 cities in Utah for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Amalga risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Amalga: 2.02.0AmalgaThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.22.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 22d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,120/mo. A contested eviction takes 22 days and costs $783–$2,927 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 29.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 511 residents, 29.7% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 0.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 3.8 (GOP margin +34.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.3, housing court bias 4.4, rent-control risk 7.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.6. Supply constraint: 7.5. The numbers behind those: 0.8% poverty, 1.3% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Amalga sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Ogden, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.7 Ogden Logan, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.2 Logan Salt Lake City, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.9 Salt Lake City West Valley City, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.6 West Valley City West Jordan, UT · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.3 West Jordan Provo, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.2 Provo St. George, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 St. George Orem, UT · 24d · ~$1.9k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.2 Orem Sandy, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Sandy Lehi, UT · 24d · ~$2.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.2 Lehi Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Amalga
Amalga · 22d · ~$1.9k all-in ($84/day) · score 2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Amalga, UT

Landlording in Amalga, Utah, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Amalga is a city of 511 residents where 29.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,120/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Amalga eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Amalga closes 22 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Amalga's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Amalga runs $783 to $2,927 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 22 days of typical timeline and $2,120/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.6/10 in Amalga, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Utah, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Amalga: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Utah's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,927 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Amalga

Trap · 7.1/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Amalga's 3.2/10 is below the Utah state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 7.1/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant abandons the property?

If you believe a tenant has abandoned the property, you can typically regain possession without a full eviction process. However, you must follow specific legal procedures, usually involving a written notice of abandonment and a waiting period (often 24-72 hours) before you can legally enter and take possession. Document everything, including evidence of abandonment like utilities being shut off or personal belongings removed. When in doubt, consult an attorney to avoid unlawful entry claims.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant for having unauthorized pets?

Yes, if your lease agreement explicitly prohibits pets or requires prior approval, and the tenant has an unauthorized pet, this constitutes a lease violation. You would issue an appropriate notice to cure or quit (often a 3-day notice to comply or vacate) depending on your lease and state law. If the tenant doesn't remove the pet or vacate, you can proceed with an eviction filing.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for every eviction in Amalga?

Not necessarily for every single case, especially if it's a straightforward non-payment eviction where the tenant doesn't respond. However, if the tenant hires a lawyer, files an answer, raises defenses, or if you are unsure about any step of the process, hiring your own attorney is highly recommended. Mistakes in eviction procedure can be costly and delay your ability to regain possession.

Q4

Can I change the locks if the tenant is late on rent?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction and can result in significant legal penalties for you, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. You must follow the formal eviction process through the courts to legally regain possession of your property. Never change locks, remove tenant belongings, or shut off utilities to force a tenant out.

Q5

What's the best way to prevent evictions in the first place?

The best prevention is thorough tenant screening and clear communication. A comprehensive background check, credit report, and verification of income and rental history are non-negotiable. Beyond that, maintaining open lines of communication with your tenants, addressing maintenance issues promptly, and being firm but fair with lease enforcement can head off many problems before they escalate to an eviction.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2/10 places Amalga in the 49th percentile of Utah cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.