Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Richmond Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49005000101 · Cache, UT · pop 5,337 · 37% of tract blocks fall in Richmond
With a score of 3/10, tract 49005000101 in Richmond, UT reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,337. Cost burden runs 16% here against 37.0% across Cache County.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,575
Renter share14.8%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$95,521
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
41
th percentile
Moderate
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Richmond and the region
Centroid at 41.9404, -111.8291 · click any tract to drill in
Why Richmond scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Richmond
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$853 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond
1.9
How Richmond compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 39%Household composition
- 13%Racial/ethnic minority
- 37%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 21Total filings over 8 yrs
- 1.13%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.1%Peak (2015)
- 3Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.3%Housing insecurity
- 5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.5%Food insecurity
- 4.3%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 7.8%No health insurance
- 15.7%Frequent mental distress
- 25.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Richmond
The clearest offset is court filing pressure at 0.9/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10.
At $853 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Richmond commands. SNAP participation runs 4.3% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 8.5% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Cache County average of 3.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 21 filings here across 8 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2015, when 2.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.1% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 49005000101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005000101?
Census tract 49005000101 in Richmond scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49005000101?
Median gross rent is $853/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 16% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49005000101?
2.5% of residents in tract 49005000101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,337.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49005000101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 39th, minority 13th, housing 37th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49005000101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 21 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 49005000101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.13% of renter households, peaking at 2.1% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49005000101 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49005000101 compare to Richmond overall?
Tract 49005000101 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Richmond at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related