Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally

Laurelwood Eviction Risk: Elevated , Federal Way

Tract 53033030005 · King County, WA · pop 6,218 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 53033030005 covers part of the Laurelwood area of Federal Way, WA, and scores 7.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,218 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.1/10.

Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 16% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,890
Renter share28.1%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate14.3%
Median income$97,535

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Laurelwood
Very Low
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#10 of 20 tracts In Federal Way
Moderate
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#135 of 494 tracts In King County
Elevated
Within state
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#225 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Federal Way and the region

Centroid at 47.3366, -122.3028 · click any tract to drill in

Why Laurelwood scores 7.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Federal Way
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
14.3% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,626 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Federal Way
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Federal Way
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Federal Way
7.0

How Laurelwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Laurelwood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.77.7This tracttract 030005Federal Way: 6.66.6Federal Wayparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 258Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 3.09%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.7%Peak (2008)
  • 29Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530330300052004: 34 filings (2.79/100 renter HHs)2005: 26 filings (2.52/100 renter HHs)2006: 17 filings (1.65/100 renter HHs)2007: 27 filings (2.62/100 renter HHs)2008: 38 filings (3.68/100 renter HHs)2009: 15 filings (1.45/100 renter HHs)2010: 26 filings (4.74/100 renter HHs)2011: 22 filings (3.34/100 renter HHs)2012: 24 filings (3.65/100 renter HHs)2013: 29 filings (4.41/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Laurelwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Laurelwood

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.6/10. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10.

Against the King County average of 6.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. Court records carry 258 eviction filings across 10 observed years.

At $1,626 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Federal Way commands. Filings peaked in 2008 at 3.7% of renter households.

In a typical year about 3.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 43% of renters.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 53033030005

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53033030005?

Census tract 53033030005 in the Laurelwood neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53033030005?

Median gross rent is $1,626/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53033030005?

14.3% of residents in tract 53033030005 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,218.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53033030005?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 67th, minority 78th, housing 89th.
Q5

Is tract 53033030005 considered part of Laurelwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53033030005 fall within Laurelwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53033030005?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 258 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 53033030005 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.09% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53033030005 compare to Federal Way overall?

Tract 53033030005 scores 7.7/10, higher than the parent city of Federal Way at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Federal Way eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Federal Way

Top eight tracts in Federal Way ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related