Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Dome District Eviction Risk: High , Tacoma

Tract 53053061602 · Pierce County, WA · pop 1,209 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 53053061602 covers part of the Dome District area of Tacoma, WA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It sits 2.7 points above the Pierce County average of 5.7.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 40% Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units636
Renter share75.6%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate25.2%
Median income$57,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Dome District
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.2401, -122.4377 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dome District scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
25.2% poverty · this tract
6.3
Supply constraint
$1,466 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Dome District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dome District risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.4This tracttract 0616027.0Tacomaparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 90Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 2.72%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.8%Peak (2006)
  • 7Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 53053061602
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 87Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.93×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dome District

76% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 2.1/10.

On the high side, local political climate reads 7.8/10. The poverty rate is 25%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.5/10. Court records carry 90 eviction filings across 11 observed years. Average gross rent is $1,466, 13% below the Tacoma average.

The worst year on record was 2006, when 5.8% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 2.7% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.1/10. Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 2.5 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053061602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053061602?

Census tract 53053061602 in the Dome District neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053061602?

Median gross rent is $1,466/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053061602?

25.2% of residents in tract 53053061602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,209.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053061602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 13th, minority 70th, housing 95th.
Q5

Is tract 53053061602 considered part of Dome District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053061602 fall within Dome District (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053061602?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 90 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053061602 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.72% of renter households, peaking at 5.8% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053061602 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.93× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053061602 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053061602 scores 8.4/10, higher than the parent city of Tacoma at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 53053061602 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 39% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related