Skip to content
Eau Claire, Wisconsin eviction risk overview
Ranked #1,122 of 1,865 nationally

Eau Claire, WI Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Eau Claire County · Population 70,322

In 2026
Risk score
4
MODERATE

95th percentile, Wisconsin.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min3.2 Average3.9 Now4
5.0 3.2 1976 · score 3.2 1977 · score 3.2 1978 · score 3.3 1979 · score 3.3 1980 · score 3.8 1981 · score 3.8 1982 · score 3.8 1983 · score 3.8 1984 · score 3.8 1985 · score 3.7 1986 · score 3.7 1987 · score 3.7 1988 · score 3.8 1989 · score 3.8 1990 · score 3.8 1991 · score 3.8 1992 · score 3.8 1993 · score 3.8 1994 · score 3.8 1995 · score 3.8 1996 · score 3.8 1997 · score 3.9 1998 · score 3.9 1999 · score 3.9 2000 · score 3.8 2001 · score 3.9 2002 · score 3.9 2003 · score 3.9 2004 · score 3.9 2005 · score 3.9 2006 · score 3.9 2007 · score 3.9 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.1 2010 · score 4.1 2011 · score 4.0 2012 · score 3.9 2013 · score 3.9 2014 · score 3.9 2015 · score 3.9 2016 · score 4.0 2017 · score 4.0 2018 · score 4.0 2019 · score 4.0 2020 · score 4.8 2021 · score 5.0 2022 · score 4.1 2023 · score 4.0 2024 · score 4.0 2025 · score 4.0 2026 · score 4.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.0 Regional 6.0 State 2.9 Economic 6.0 Supply 7.2 Rent Control 4.0 Eviction 2.3 Tenant 8.7 Housing 5.3 4 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +10.6% (2024)
    6.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.0
  3. State political climate
    Wisconsin legislature & governorship
    2.9
  4. Economic stress
    14.2% poverty · 3.7% unemp.
    6.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,045 average · 45.6% renters
    7.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    25.1% of income on rent
    4.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    47 days filing → judgment
    2.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    45.6% renters
    8.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Eau Claire and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Eau Claire compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Eau Claire County
High
#2 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 cities in Eau Claire County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Wisconsin
Very High
#74 of 803 cities
Rank in state, 91st percentileLowHigh
#74 of 803 cities in Wisconsin for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Eau Claire risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Eau Claire: 4.04.0Eau ClaireThis cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avg

Wisconsin landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Wisconsin statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.8 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 47d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,045/mo. A contested eviction takes 47 days and costs $1,733–$4,944 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 45.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 70,322 residents, 45.6% rent. 25% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 14.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6 and 6 (Dem margin +10.6% (2024)). State climate at 2.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.3, housing court bias 5.3, rent-control risk 4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.7 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6. Supply constraint: 7.2. The numbers behind those: 14.2% poverty, 3.7% unemployment, 25% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Eau Claire sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Milwaukee, WI · 49d · ~$3.2k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.4 Milwaukee Madison, WI · 45d · ~$3.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 4.6 Madison Green Bay, WI · 51d · ~$3.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 3.4 Green Bay Kenosha, WI · 53d · ~$3.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.6 Kenosha Racine, WI · 51d · ~$3.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.6 Racine Appleton, WI · 48d · ~$3.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.7 Appleton Waukesha, WI · 54d · ~$3.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 4 Waukesha Oshkosh, WI · 47d · ~$3.5k all-in ($74/day) · score 4 Oshkosh Janesville, WI · 46d · ~$3.7k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.8 Janesville West Allis, WI · 50d · ~$3.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 4.1 West Allis Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Eau Claire
Eau Claire · 47d · ~$3.3k all-in ($71/day) · score 4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Eau Claire, WI

Landlording in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Eau Claire is a city of 70,322 residents where 45.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 25.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,045/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Eau Claire eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Eau Claire closes 47 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Eau Claire's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Eau Claire runs $1,733 to $4,944 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 47 days of typical timeline and $1,045/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.7/10 in Eau Claire, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Wisconsin, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Eau Claire: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Wisconsin's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,944 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Eau Claire

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Eau Claire to neighboring cities in Eau Claire County via the grid below. The 4/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under Wis. Stat. 704 + ATCP 134. Eau Claire County 2020 presidential margin: D+10.8. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Wisconsin statutory detail.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,980 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.90× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 25,794 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 145,103.

  • 1,980Past month
  • 25,794Past 12 months
  • 0.90×vs baseline (past mo)
  • 15.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least five days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $94.50 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 2,410 filings (1.01× hist)2023-06-01: 2,537 filings (1.03× hist)2023-07-01: 2,536 filings (0.99× hist)2023-08-01: 2,743 filings (1.04× hist)2023-09-01: 2,286 filings (1.07× hist)2023-10-01: 2,552 filings (1.07× hist)2023-11-01: 2,151 filings (1.13× hist)2023-12-01: 2,077 filings (1.16× hist)2024-01-01: 2,545 filings (1.00× hist)2024-02-01: 2,259 filings (1.07× hist)2024-03-01: 2,032 filings (0.97× hist)2024-04-01: 2,340 filings (1.06× hist)2024-05-01: 2,378 filings (0.99× hist)2024-06-01: 2,392 filings (0.97× hist)2024-07-01: 2,589 filings (1.01× hist)2024-08-01: 2,514 filings (0.96× hist)2024-09-01: 1,996 filings (0.93× hist)2024-10-01: 2,235 filings (0.93× hist)2024-11-01: 1,659 filings (0.87× hist)2024-12-01: 1,713 filings (0.95× hist)2025-01-01: 2,112 filings (0.83× hist)2025-02-01: 1,680 filings (0.81× hist)2025-03-01: 1,693 filings (0.81× hist)2025-04-01: 2,086 filings (0.95× hist)2025-05-01: 2,137 filings (0.89× hist)2025-06-01: 2,246 filings (0.91× hist)2025-07-01: 2,504 filings (0.98× hist)2025-08-01: 2,486 filings (0.95× hist)2025-09-01: 2,440 filings (1.14× hist)2025-10-01: 2,083 filings (0.87× hist)2025-11-01: 1,776 filings (0.93× hist)2025-12-01: 1,854 filings (1.03× hist)2026-01-01: 2,385 filings (0.93× hist)2026-02-01: 1,958 filings (0.94× hist)2026-03-01: 1,945 filings (0.93× hist)2026-04-01: 1,980 filings (0.90× hist)
Filings dropped 7% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What happens if my Eau Claire tenant doesn't move out after the eviction order?

If the court grants an eviction judgment and the tenant still doesn't leave, you'll need to get a writ of restitution from the court. This writ authorizes the sheriff to physically remove the tenant and their belongings. You cannot do this yourself. The sheriff will schedule a lockout, and you'll need to be there to take possession.
Q2

Can I raise the rent in Eau Claire whenever I want?

Wisconsin does not have statewide rent control (Wisconsin rent control rules). You can raise the rent, but you must provide proper notice as specified in your lease or by state law (typically 28 days for month-to-month tenancies). For a fixed-term lease, you can only raise the rent at renewal, unless the lease specifies otherwise.
Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Eau Claire?

While you can technically represent yourself, it's highly recommended to hire an attorney, especially if it's your first eviction or if the tenant is contesting it. Eviction law is complex, and even small procedural errors can cause significant delays and costs. Given the typical cost range of $1,733, $4,944, an attorney's fee is often a worthwhile investment to ensure it's done right.
Q4

What if my tenant claims there are maintenance issues to avoid eviction?

Tenants can raise maintenance issues as a defense in an eviction case. It's critical to keep detailed records of all maintenance requests and your responses. If you can show you addressed issues promptly or that the claims are unfounded, it strengthens your case. Neglecting legitimate repairs can complicate your eviction significantly.
Q5

Is there anything like "tenant protections" specific to Eau Claire landlords?

While there are no specific "tenant protection" laws unique to Eau Claire that dramatically alter state law, you should be aware of broader Wisconsin tenant protections. These include rules around security deposits, landlord entry, and retaliatory evictions. For a detailed look, see our Wisconsin tenant protections guide. Always operate within the bounds of state law.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4/10 places Eau Claire in the 95th percentile of Wisconsin cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.