Skip to content
Marbury, Alabama eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,570 residents

Marbury, AL Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Autauga County · Population 1,570

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

56th percentile, Alabama.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average2.6 Now2.2
3.5 2.0 1976 · score 3.4 1977 · score 3.4 1978 · score 3.4 1979 · score 3.5 1980 · score 3.5 1981 · score 3.5 1982 · score 3.5 1983 · score 3.4 1984 · score 3.3 1985 · score 3.2 1986 · score 3.1 1987 · score 3.0 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 2.8 1993 · score 2.9 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.5 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.4 2003 · score 2.3 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.1 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.1 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.4 2011 · score 2.4 2012 · score 2.3 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.1 2019 · score 2.1 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 3.1 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 2.3 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.5 Regional 3.5 State 1.8 Economic 6.0 Supply 2.0 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.2 Tenant 2.0 Housing 1.0 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +46.3% (2024)
    3.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.5
  3. State political climate
    Alabama legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    14.1% poverty · 3.6% unemp.
    6.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,294 average · 5.7% renters
    2.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    24.7% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    27 days filing → judgment
    2.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    5.7% renters
    2.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Marbury and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Marbury compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Autauga County
Moderate
#3 of 5 cities
Rank in county, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 cities in Autauga County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Alabama
Moderate
#292 of 593 cities
Rank in state, 51st percentileLowHigh
#292 of 593 cities in Alabama for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Marbury risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Marbury: 2.22.2MarburyThis cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg in countyState: 2.42.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-1.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 27d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,294/mo. A contested eviction takes 27 days and costs $916–$2,447 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 5.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,570 residents, 5.7% rent. 25% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 14.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.5 and 3.5 (GOP margin +46.3% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.2, housing court bias 1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6. Supply constraint: 2. The numbers behind those: 14.1% poverty, 3.6% unemployment, 25% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Marbury sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Montgomery, AL · 28d · ~$2.0k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.8 Montgomery Huntsville, AL · 29d · ~$2.0k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 Huntsville Mobile, AL · 30d · ~$1.9k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.8 Mobile Birmingham, AL · 32d · ~$1.7k all-in ($52/day) · score 2.9 Birmingham Tuscaloosa, AL · 28d · ~$1.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.8 Tuscaloosa Hoover, AL · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.2 Hoover Auburn, AL · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.5 Auburn Dothan, AL · 31d · ~$1.9k all-in ($61/day) · score 2.5 Dothan Madison, AL · 30d · ~$2.1k all-in ($69/day) · score 2 Madison Decatur, AL · 31d · ~$1.8k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.5 Decatur Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Marbury
Marbury · 27d · ~$1.7k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Marbury, AL

Landlording in Marbury, Alabama, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Marbury is a city of 1,570 residents where 5.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 24.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,294/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Marbury eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Marbury closes 27 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Marbury's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Marbury runs $916 to $2,447 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 27 days of typical timeline and $1,294/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2/10 in Marbury, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Alabama, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Marbury: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Alabama's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,447 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Marbury

Trap · ALA. CODE 35-9A AURLTA
Compare Marbury to nearby cities in Autauga County via the related-cities grid below. Each municipality scores separately on the same nine sub-factors. State context: Ala. Code 35-9A AURLTA.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Marbury without a reason?

For a month-to-month lease, yes, generally you can terminate with a 30-day notice without needing to state a specific "just cause," as long as it's not discriminatory or retaliatory. For a fixed-term lease, you need a lease violation or other specified reason to evict before the lease term ends.

Q2

How long does it take to get a tenant out for non-payment in Marbury?

The typical timeline is about 27 days from when you serve the initial 7-day pay-or-quit notice until the tenant is removed by the sheriff. This can vary if there are court delays or if the tenant contests the eviction.

Q3

What if my tenant pays partial rent after I give an eviction notice?

Be very careful. Accepting partial rent can sometimes waive your right to proceed with the current eviction notice, meaning you might have to start the 7-day notice process all over again. If you do accept it, get a written agreement that it does not waive your eviction rights and specifies the remaining balance and due date.

Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Marbury?

While you can represent yourself in district court, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney, especially if you're unfamiliar with the process or if the tenant plans to fight the eviction. Mistakes in procedure can cause significant delays and cost you more in the long run. See our Alabama eviction risk overview for more state-level details.

Q5

What are the rules for security deposits in Marbury?

There's no statutory cap on how much you can charge for a security deposit. You must return the deposit, or an itemized list of deductions, within 60 days of the tenant vacating the property. Failure to comply can result in owing the tenant double the amount wrongfully withheld.

Q6

Can I turn off utilities to get a tenant to leave?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction and can result in severe penalties for you, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. Always follow the legal eviction process. Landlords in Autauga County should be especially aware of this; find more local info on our Autauga County eviction guide.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places Marbury in the 56th percentile of Alabama cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.