Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Automotive Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Birmingham

Tract 01073004502 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,171 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 5.4/10, tract 01073004502 in the Automotive Historic District area of Birmingham, AL reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,171. 93% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45% Stable renters 48% Owners 7%
Tract context
Occupied units2,286
Renter share93.0%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate34.8%
Median income$49,269

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Automotive Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 71 tracts In Birmingham
Moderate
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#73 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.5071, -86.8031 · click any tract to drill in

Why Automotive Historic District scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
34.8% poverty · this tract
8.7
Supply constraint
$1,466 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0

How Automotive Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Automotive Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 0045024.0Birminghamparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Automotive Historic District

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. The poverty rate is 35%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Average gross rent is $1,466, 32% above the Birmingham average.

Annualized rent equals 36% of average household income of $49,269, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 8.7/10.

Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. It sits 1.1 points above the Jefferson County average of 4.3.

The voucher gap is 15.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 6.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073004502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073004502?

Census tract 01073004502 in the Automotive Historic District neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073004502?

Median gross rent is $1,466/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073004502?

34.8% of residents in tract 01073004502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,171.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073004502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 2th, minority 74th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 01073004502 considered part of Automotive Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073004502 fall within Automotive Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 01073004502 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01073004502 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073004502 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 01073004502 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 37% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related