Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Continental at Superstition Springs Eviction Risk: Lower , Mesa

Tract 04013422622 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 4,372 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 04013422622 in the Continental at Superstition Springs area of Gilbert, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,372. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 13% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,452
Renter share23.5%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate5.8%
Median income$116,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Continental at Superstition Springs
Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#39 of 58 tracts In Mesa
Low
Within county
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#829 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Very Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mesa and the region

Centroid at 33.3690, -111.6950 · click any tract to drill in

Why Continental at Superstition Springs scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mesa
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
5.8% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,009 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mesa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mesa
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mesa
2.0

How Continental at Superstition Springs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Continental at Superstition Springs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 422622Mesa: 3.23.2Mesaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 5.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.4%Peak (2002)
  • 3Filings in 2002 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040134226222001: 2 filings (4.28/100 renter HHs)2002: 3 filings (6.42/100 renter HHs)2003: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Continental at Superstition Springs. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Continental at Superstition Springs

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.4/10.

Court records carry 5 eviction filings across 2 observed years. SNAP participation runs 7.5% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.7 points below the Maricopa County average of 3.7.

The worst year on record was 2002, when 6.4% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 5.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013422622

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013422622?

Census tract 04013422622 in the Continental at Superstition Springs neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013422622?

Median gross rent is $2,009/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013422622?

5.8% of residents in tract 04013422622 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,372.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013422622?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 32th, minority 45th, housing 57th.
Q5

Is tract 04013422622 considered part of Continental at Superstition Springs?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013422622 fall within Continental at Superstition Springs (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013422622?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 04013422622 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.35% of renter households, peaking at 6.4% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013422622 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013422622 compare to Mesa overall?

Tract 04013422622 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Mesa at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mesa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mesa

Top eight tracts in Mesa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related