Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally

Clearview Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Paradise Valley

Tract 04013105103 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 2,969 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 04013105103 covers the Clearview Hills neighborhood of Paradise Valley in Arizona. Home to 2,969 residents, it scores 3.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 8th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 0% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $228,445 a year. About 3% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 3% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,205
Renter share3.2%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$228,445

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Clearview Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Paradise Valley
Elevated
Within county
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#942 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Very Low
Within state
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#1,683 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Paradise Valley and the region

Centroid at 33.5357, -111.9906 · click any tract to drill in

Why Clearview Hills scores 1.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Paradise Valley
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Paradise Valley
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Paradise Valley
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Paradise Valley
2.4

How Clearview Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Clearview Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.31.3This tracttract 105103Paradise Valley: 2.02.0Paradise Valleyparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 9Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 6.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.2%Peak (2002)
  • 4Filings in 2004 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040131051032001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 4 filings (8.24/100 renter HHs)2003: 1 filings (2.06/100 renter HHs)2004: 4 filings (8.24/100 renter HHs)2005: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Clearview Hills

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Paradise Valley, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Maricopa County average of 5.1 and below the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 3.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013105103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013105103?

Census tract 04013105103 in the Clearview Hills neighborhood scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013105103?

4.2% of residents in tract 04013105103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,969.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013105103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 6th, minority 39th, housing 10th.
Q4

Is tract 04013105103 considered part of Clearview Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013105103 fall within Clearview Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013105103?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 04013105103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.18% of renter households, peaking at 8.2% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 04013105103 struggle to pay rent?

About 3.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 04013105103 compare to Paradise Valley overall?

Tract 04013105103 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Paradise Valley at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Paradise Valley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Paradise Valley

Top eight tracts in Paradise Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related