Skip to content
Sells, Arizona eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,935 residents

Sells, AZ Eviction Risk: LOW

Pima County · Population 1,935

In 2026
Risk score
2.8
LOW

74th percentile, Arizona.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average2.0 Now2.8
2.9 1.4 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.5 1982 · score 1.7 1983 · score 1.6 1984 · score 1.4 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.6 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.8 1994 · score 1.8 1995 · score 1.8 1996 · score 2.0 1997 · score 2.0 1998 · score 2.0 1999 · score 2.0 2000 · score 1.9 2001 · score 2.0 2002 · score 2.0 2003 · score 1.9 2004 · score 1.8 2005 · score 1.7 2006 · score 1.6 2007 · score 1.6 2008 · score 1.8 2009 · score 2.1 2010 · score 2.1 2011 · score 2.1 2012 · score 2.0 2013 · score 2.0 2014 · score 2.0 2015 · score 2.0 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.2 2018 · score 2.2 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 2.7 2021 · score 2.9 2022 · score 2.5 2023 · score 2.5 2024 · score 2.8 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.3 Regional 6.3 State 2.2 Economic 9.6 Supply 4.8 Rent Control 1.5 Eviction 2.4 Tenant 8.4 Housing 5.6 2.8 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +15.2% (2024)
    6.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.3
  3. State political climate
    Arizona legislature & governorship
    2.2
  4. Economic stress
    46.9% poverty · 16.4% unemp.
    9.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $383 average · 38.6% renters
    4.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    11.3% of income on rent
    1.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    37 days filing → judgment
    2.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    38.6% renters
    8.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sells and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Sells compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Pima County
High
#12 of 49 cities
Rank in county, 77th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 49 cities in Pima County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Arizona
Elevated
#159 of 464 cities
Rank in state, 66th percentileLowHigh
#159 of 464 cities in Arizona for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Sells risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Sells: 2.82.8SellsThis cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.8
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.8 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 37d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $383/mo. A contested eviction takes 37 days and costs $1,962–$4,327 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 38.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,935 residents, 38.6% rent. 11% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 46.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.3 and 6.3 (Dem margin +15.2% (2024)). State climate at 2.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.4, housing court bias 5.6, rent-control risk 1.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 9.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 9.6. Supply constraint: 4.8. The numbers behind those: 46.9% poverty, 16.4% unemployment, 11% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Sells sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Tucson, AZ · 43d · ~$3.3k all-in ($78/day) · score 3.2 Tucson Mesa, AZ · 38d · ~$3.1k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.8 Mesa Gilbert, AZ · 37d · ~$3.6k all-in ($97/day) · score 2.4 Gilbert Chandler, AZ · 40d · ~$3.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.5 Chandler Glendale, AZ · 42d · ~$3.0k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.9 Glendale Scottsdale, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($88/day) · score 2.3 Scottsdale Peoria, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.4 Peoria Tempe, AZ · 37d · ~$3.0k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.1 Tempe Surprise, AZ · 41d · ~$2.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.4 Surprise Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Sells
Sells · 37d · ~$3.1k all-in ($85/day) · score 2.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Sells, AZ

Landlording in Sells, Arizona, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.8/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Sells is a city of 1,935 residents where 38.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 11.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $383/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Sells eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Sells closes 37 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Sells's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Sells runs $1,962 to $4,327 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 37 days of typical timeline and $383/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.4/10 in Sells, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Arizona, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Sells: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Arizona's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,327 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Sells

Trap · 18.7 POINTS
Politically, Pima County voted Democratic by 18.7 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 11.3% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of ARLTA ARS 33.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What happens if my Sells tenant pays partial rent after I serve the 5-day notice?

Generally, accepting a partial payment after serving a 5-day pay-or-quit notice can invalidate your notice and require you to start the eviction process over. If you accept partial payment, it's often considered that you've waived your right to proceed with the eviction based on that specific notice. Only accept full payment, or have a clear, written agreement with the tenant stating the partial payment does not waive your right to evict and the remaining balance is still due by a specific date.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Sells for a minor lease violation?

For minor lease violations that are not material non-compliance (meaning they don't significantly affect health, safety, or the enjoyment of the property), you typically cannot evict immediately. For material non-compliance that is curable (like unauthorized pets or excessive noise), you would serve a 10-day cure-or-quit notice. If the tenant doesn't fix the issue within 10 days, then you can proceed with an eviction filing. Always check your lease and Arizona statutes for specifics.

Q3

How long does it take to get a court date for an eviction in Pima County?

After you file an eviction complaint for non-payment of rent in Pima County Justice Court, a hearing is typically scheduled quickly, often within 3-6 business days. This fast-track scheduling is designed to expedite non-payment cases. However, the exact timing can depend on court caseloads and holidays.

Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Sells?

While you are not legally required to have an attorney for an eviction in Arizona Justice Court, it is highly recommended, especially if you are not familiar with the process or if the tenant is contesting the eviction. An attorney can ensure all notices are served correctly, paperwork is filed properly, and you present your case effectively, significantly reducing the chance of errors that could delay or derail your eviction. For more complex cases or if the tenant has legal representation, an attorney is almost essential.

Q5

What should I do if my Sells tenant abandons the property?

If you believe your tenant has abandoned the property, you cannot simply change the locks. Arizona law has specific procedures for determining abandonment. You must typically post a notice of abandonment on the property and mail it to the tenant's last known address, giving them a specific number of days to respond. If they don't respond, you can then take possession. Improperly handling abandonment can lead to legal issues. Consult the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (A.R.S. § 33-1370) or an attorney for guidance.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.8/10 places Sells in the 74th percentile of Arizona cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.