Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Chickasaw Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , Little Rock

Tract 05119004500 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 2,130 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 05119004500 belongs to the Chickasaw Place neighborhood of Little Rock, Arkansas. It is home to 2,130 residents and scores 4.6/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 27th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 45% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,069 a month while the average household earns $36,154 a year, roughly 35% of income at the averages. Renters make up 68% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 38% Owners 32%
Tract context
Occupied units748
Renter share68.4%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate20.4%
Median income$36,154

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Chickasaw Place
Very Low
Within parent city
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 58 tracts In Little Rock
Elevated
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 107 tracts In Pulaski County
Elevated
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#198 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little Rock and the region

Centroid at 34.7394, -92.2926 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chickasaw Place scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Little Rock
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
20.4% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$1,069 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Rock
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Rock
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Rock
2.0

How Chickasaw Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chickasaw Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 004500Little Rock: 2.22.2Little Rockparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chickasaw Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chickasaw Place

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 5.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 82nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 05119004500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119004500?

Census tract 05119004500 in the Chickasaw Place neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05119004500?

Median gross rent is $1,069/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05119004500?

20.4% of residents in tract 05119004500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,130.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05119004500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 45th, minority 90th, housing 76th.
Q5

Is tract 05119004500 considered part of Chickasaw Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 05119004500 fall within Chickasaw Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 05119004500 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 05119004500 compare to Little Rock overall?

Tract 05119004500 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Little Rock at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 05119004500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 49% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Little Rock

Top eight tracts in Little Rock ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related