Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #6,848 of 84,120 nationally

Hicks Interuban Addition Eviction Risk: Elevated , Little Rock

Tract 05119002410 · Pulaski County, AR · pop 3,449 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 05119002410 covers Hicks Interuban Addition in Little Rock, home to 3,449 residents. For landlords it grades 5.1/10, a moderate reading. It lands near the 44th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

68% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $417 a month against an average household income of $26,875 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 65% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 44% Stable renters 21% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,536
Renter share64.9%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate42.2%
Median income$26,875

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Hicks Interuban Addition
Very High
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 58 tracts In Little Rock
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 107 tracts In Pulaski County
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little Rock and the region

Centroid at 34.7315, -92.3852 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hicks Interuban Addition scores 6.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Little Rock
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
42.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$417 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Rock
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Rock
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Rock
2.0

How Hicks Interuban Addition compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hicks Interuban Addition risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.66.6This tracttract 002410Little Rock: 2.22.2Little Rockparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hicks Interuban Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hicks Interuban Addition

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pulaski County average of 4.5 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 24.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 20.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 05119002410

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05119002410?

Census tract 05119002410 in the Hicks Interuban Addition neighborhood scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05119002410?

Median gross rent is $417/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05119002410?

42.2% of residents in tract 05119002410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,449.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05119002410?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 83th, minority 86th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 05119002410 considered part of Hicks Interuban Addition?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 05119002410 fall within Hicks Interuban Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 05119002410 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 05119002410 compare to Little Rock overall?

Tract 05119002410 scores 6.6/10, higher than the parent city of Little Rock at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Rock eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Little Rock

Top eight tracts in Little Rock ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related