Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Village II Eviction Risk: Moderate , Livermore
Tract 06001451506 · Alameda, CA · pop 3,548 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
With a score of 5.4/10, tract 06001451506 in the Village II area of Livermore, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,548 residents. 62% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Alameda County average of 45.5%.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units982
Renter share45.9%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate2.8%
Median income$135,517
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
6
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
6
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
12
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Livermore and the region
Centroid at 37.6834, -121.7292 · click any tract to drill in
Why Village II scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Livermore
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,729 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Livermore
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Livermore
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Livermore
5.0
How Village II compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 28
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 9%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 52%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Village II. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.0%Food insecurity
- 8.6%SNAP enrollment
- 6.6%Transit barriers
- 7.4%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 24.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Village II
Against the Alameda County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.4 points. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.3/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
On the national scale it lands near the 70th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.1 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Average gross rent is $2,729, close to the Livermore average.
Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $135,517.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06001451506
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001451506?
Census tract 06001451506 in the Village II neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06001451506?
Median gross rent is $2,729/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06001451506?
2.8% of residents in tract 06001451506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,548.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06001451506?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 32th, minority 75th, housing 52th.
Q5
Is tract 06001451506 considered part of Village II?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001451506 fall within Village II (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06001451506 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06001451506 compare to Livermore overall?
Tract 06001451506 scores 5.4/10, lower than the parent city of Livermore at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Livermore; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Livermore
Top eight tracts in Livermore ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Springtown
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Portola Glen
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Autumn Springs
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
The Grove
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06001451602
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06001451103
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
California Ranch
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Village II
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Related