Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,622 of 84,120 nationally
Iron Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Richmond
Tract 06013368001 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,013 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 8.8/10, tract 06013368001 in the Iron Triangle area of San Pablo, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,013. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.
Risk score
8.8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 26%
Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,470
Renter share51.6%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate14.1%
Median income$97,244
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
17
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
90
th percentile
Very High
Within state
77
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Richmond and the region
Centroid at 37.9543, -122.3525 · click any tract to drill in
Why Iron Triangle scores 8.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Richmond
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.1% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,898 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond
6.7
How Iron Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 84
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 78%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 92%Racial/ethnic minority
- 63%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Iron Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 25.9%Housing insecurity
- 12.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.9%Food insecurity
- 25.7%SNAP enrollment
- 15.2%Transit barriers
- 22.3%No health insurance
- 19.2%Frequent mental distress
- 35.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Iron Triangle
Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Against the Contra Costa County average of 6.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.1/10.
Housing insecurity runs 25.9% against 14.2% nationally. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.6/10. SNAP participation runs 25.7% against 15.2% nationally.
That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.3 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 50% of renters.
Average gross rent is $1,898, close to the San Pablo average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013368001
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013368001?
Census tract 06013368001 in the Iron Triangle neighborhood scores 8.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013368001?
Median gross rent is $1,898/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013368001?
14.1% of residents in tract 06013368001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,013.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013368001?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 87th, minority 92th, housing 63th.
Q5
Is tract 06013368001 considered part of Iron Triangle?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013368001 fall within Iron Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013368001 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013368001 compare to Richmond overall?
Tract 06013368001 scores 8.8/10, higher than the parent city of Richmond at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Richmond
Top eight tracts in Richmond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related