Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1,292 of 84,120 nationally

Iron Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Richmond

Tract 06013377000 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 7,826 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 06013377000 covers Iron Triangle in Richmond in California. Home to 7,826 residents, it scores 6.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 86% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 52% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,344 a month while the average household earns $43,604 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. About 60% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 29% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units2,583
Renter share59.7%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate22.1%
Median income$43,604

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Iron Triangle
Very High
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 21 tracts In Richmond
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 241 tracts In Contra Costa
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#514 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richmond and the region

Centroid at 37.9338, -122.3630 · click any tract to drill in

Why Iron Triangle scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richmond
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.1% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$1,344 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond
7.3

How Iron Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Iron Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 377000Richmond: 8.18.1Richmondparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Iron Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Iron Triangle

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richmond eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 29.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013377000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013377000?

Census tract 06013377000 in the Iron Triangle neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06013377000?

Median gross rent is $1,344/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013377000?

22.1% of residents in tract 06013377000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,826.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013377000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 88th, minority 95th, housing 91th.
Q5

Is tract 06013377000 considered part of Iron Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013377000 fall within Iron Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06013377000 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06013377000 compare to Richmond overall?

Tract 06013377000 scores 8.4/10, higher than the parent city of Richmond at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richmond

Top eight tracts in Richmond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related