Neighborhood · Ranked #4,396 of 84,120 nationally

Iron Triangle Eviction Risk: Elevated , Richmond

Tract 06013373000 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 4,386 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Here is how census tract 06013373000, in Iron Triangle in Richmond eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 6.1/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 4,386. That is riskier than about 79% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 41% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,186 a month while the average household earns $79,417 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

7.1

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 30% Owners 49%

Tract context

Occupied units1,363

Renter share51.0%

SVI overall0.95

Poverty rate15.7%

Median income$79,417

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Richmond and the region

Centroid at 37.9476, -122.3538 · click any tract to drill in

Why Iron Triangle scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Richmond

8.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

15.7% poverty · this tract

3.9

Supply constraint

$2,186 rent vs county FMR

3.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from Richmond

8.2

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Richmond

8.9

Housing court bias

Inherited from Richmond

7.3

How Iron Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

82%Socioeconomic
89%Household composition
95%Racial/ethnic minority
94%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Iron Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

27.1%Housing insecurity
13.0%Utility-shutoff threat
33.2%Food insecurity
28.4%SNAP enrollment
16.2%Transit barriers
23.8%No health insurance
19.6%Frequent mental distress
37.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Iron Triangle

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richmond eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 27.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013373000

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013373000?

Census tract 06013373000 in the Iron Triangle neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06013373000?

Median gross rent is $2,186/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013373000?

15.7% of residents in tract 06013373000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,386.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013373000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 89th, minority 95th, housing 94th.

Is tract 06013373000 considered part of Iron Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013373000 fall within Iron Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06013373000 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06013373000 compare to Richmond overall?

Tract 06013373000 scores 7.1/10, lower than the parent city of Richmond at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richmond

Top eight tracts in Richmond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.