Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,892 of 84,120 nationally

Iron Triangle Eviction Risk: Elevated , Richmond

Tract 06013376000 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 6,712 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 06013376000 belongs to Iron Triangle in Richmond, California. It is home to 6,712 residents and scores 6.3/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 48% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,506 a month while the average household earns $73,197 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 65% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 34% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,850
Renter share65.2%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate19.3%
Median income$73,197

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Iron Triangle
High
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 21 tracts In Richmond
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 241 tracts In Contra Costa
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,333 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richmond and the region

Centroid at 37.9410, -122.3624 · click any tract to drill in

Why Iron Triangle scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richmond
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.3% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$1,506 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond
7.3

How Iron Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Iron Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.67.6This tracttract 376000Richmond: 8.18.1Richmondparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Iron Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Iron Triangle

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richmond eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 28.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013376000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013376000?

Census tract 06013376000 in the Iron Triangle neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06013376000?

Median gross rent is $1,506/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013376000?

19.3% of residents in tract 06013376000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,712.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013376000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 71th, minority 99th, housing 78th.
Q5

Is tract 06013376000 considered part of Iron Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013376000 fall within Iron Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06013376000 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06013376000 compare to Richmond overall?

Tract 06013376000 scores 7.6/10, lower than the parent city of Richmond at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richmond

Top eight tracts in Richmond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related