Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally
Iron Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Richmond
Tract 06013376000 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 6,712 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 06013376000 sits in the Iron Triangle area of Richmond eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.2/10. Population here is 6,712. Against the Contra Costa County average of 6.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.4 points.
Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,850
Renter share65.2%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate19.3%
Median income$73,197
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
85
th percentile
High
Within county
95
th percentile
Very High
Within state
83
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Richmond and the region
Centroid at 37.9410, -122.3624 · click any tract to drill in
Why Iron Triangle scores 9.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Richmond
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.3% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$1,506 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond
7.3
How Iron Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 71%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 78%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Iron Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 28.1%Housing insecurity
- 14.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.0%Food insecurity
- 30.5%SNAP enrollment
- 17.0%Transit barriers
- 21.6%No health insurance
- 20.8%Frequent mental distress
- 37.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Iron Triangle
The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.
The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 34.0% against 17.8% nationally.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. This is renter territory: 65% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Average gross rent is $1,506, 23% below the Richmond average. Adults with no health insurance runs 21.6% against 11.3% nationally. The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.3/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
48% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013376000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013376000?
Census tract 06013376000 in the Iron Triangle neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013376000?
Median gross rent is $1,506/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013376000?
19.3% of residents in tract 06013376000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,712.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013376000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 71th, minority 99th, housing 78th.
Q5
Is tract 06013376000 considered part of Iron Triangle?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013376000 fall within Iron Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013376000 struggle to pay rent?
About 28.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013376000 compare to Richmond overall?
Tract 06013376000 scores 9.2/10, higher than the parent city of Richmond at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Richmond
Top eight tracts in Richmond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Iron Triangle
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Iron Triangle
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Easter Hill Village
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Easter Hill Village
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Easter Hill Village
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Richmond Annex
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
06013365003
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
06013367100
9.2
/ 10 · Very High
Related