Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally
Iron Triangle Eviction Risk: Moderate , Richmond
Tract 06013368001 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,013 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Tract 06013368001 covers Iron Triangle in Richmond in California. Home to 5,013 residents, it scores 6.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 82nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,898 a month while the average household earns $97,244 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 26%
Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,470
Renter share51.6%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate14.1%
Median income$97,244
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
17
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
83
th percentile
High
Within state
57
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Richmond and the region
Centroid at 37.9543, -122.3525 · click any tract to drill in
Why Iron Triangle scores 5.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Richmond
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.1% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,898 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond
6.7
How Iron Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 84
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 78%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 92%Racial/ethnic minority
- 63%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Iron Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 25.9%Housing insecurity
- 12.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.9%Food insecurity
- 25.7%SNAP enrollment
- 15.2%Transit barriers
- 22.3%No health insurance
- 19.2%Frequent mental distress
- 35.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Iron Triangle
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richmond eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 84th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 25.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013368001
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013368001?
Census tract 06013368001 in the Iron Triangle neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013368001?
Median gross rent is $1,898/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013368001?
14.1% of residents in tract 06013368001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,013.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013368001?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 87th, minority 92th, housing 63th.
Q5
Is tract 06013368001 considered part of Iron Triangle?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013368001 fall within Iron Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013368001 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013368001 compare to Richmond overall?
Tract 06013368001 scores 5.9/10, lower than the parent city of Richmond at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Richmond
Top eight tracts in Richmond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related