Skip to content
Shingle Springs, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 3,801 residents

Shingle Springs, CA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

El Dorado County · Population 3,801

In 2026
Risk score
6.6
ELEVATED

68th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average3.1 Now6.6
10 5 1976 · score 1.4 1977 · score 1.4 1978 · score 1.4 1979 · score 1.4 1980 · score 1.4 1981 · score 1.5 1982 · score 1.5 1983 · score 1.5 1984 · score 1.5 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.7 1990 · score 1.8 1991 · score 1.8 1992 · score 2.2 1993 · score 2.3 1994 · score 2.3 1995 · score 2.3 1996 · score 2.4 1997 · score 2.4 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.9 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.0 2003 · score 3.0 2004 · score 2.9 2005 · score 3.0 2006 · score 3.1 2007 · score 3.1 2008 · score 3.8 2009 · score 3.9 2010 · score 3.9 2011 · score 4.0 2012 · score 3.9 2013 · score 4.0 2014 · score 4.1 2015 · score 4.1 2016 · score 4.3 2017 · score 4.5 2018 · score 4.6 2019 · score 4.9 2020 · score 5.7 2021 · score 5.7 2022 · score 5.6 2023 · score 5.6 2024 · score 5.5 2025 · score 4.8 2026 · score 6.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.4 Regional 4.4 State 6.8 Economic 5.3 Supply 6.7 Rent Control 3.6 Eviction 6.1 Tenant 5.1 Housing 3.8 6.6 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +12.0% (2024)
    4.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.4
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    6.9% poverty · 4.9% unemp.
    5.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,411 average · 12.3% renters
    6.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    21.8% of income on rent
    3.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    281 days filing → judgment
    6.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    12.3% renters
    5.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Shingle Springs and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Shingle Springs compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in El Dorado County
Elevated
#5 of 13 cities
Rank in county, 67th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 13 cities in El Dorado County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Elevated
#535 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 67th percentileBottomTop
#535 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Shingle Springs risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Shingle Springs: 6.66.6Shingle SpringsThis cityCounty: 6.66.6Countyavg in countyState: 7.27.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.6
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 281d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,411/mo. A contested eviction takes 281 days and costs $14,831-$36,033 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 12.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 3,801 residents, 12.3% rent. 22% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 6.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.4 and 4.4 (GOP margin +12.0% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.1, housing court bias 3.8, rent-control risk 3.6. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.3. Supply constraint: 6.7. The numbers behind those: 6.9% poverty, 4.9% unemployment, 22% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Shingle Springs sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.6 Sacramento Elk Grove, CA · 245d · ~$24.4k all-in ($100/day) · score 7.2 Elk Grove Roseville, CA · 266d · ~$28.2k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Roseville Arden-Arcade, CA · 279d · ~$26.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 8 Arden-Arcade Citrus Heights, CA · 276d · ~$25.3k all-in ($92/day) · score 7.5 Citrus Heights Folsom, CA · 257d · ~$25.6k all-in ($100/day) · score 6.4 Folsom Rancho Cordova, CA · 271d · ~$25.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.9 Rancho Cordova Carmichael, CA · 263d · ~$27.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 8 Carmichael Rocklin, CA · 272d · ~$24.8k all-in ($91/day) · score 6 Rocklin Yuba City, CA · 255d · ~$26.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 6.2 Yuba City Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Shingle Springs
Shingle Springs · 281d · ~$25.4k all-in ($91/day) · score 6.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Shingle Springs, CA

Landlording in Shingle Springs, California, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.6/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Shingle Springs is a city of 3,801 residents where 12.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 21.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,411/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Shingle Springs eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Shingle Springs closes 281 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Shingle Springs's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Shingle Springs runs $14,831 to $36,033 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 281 days of typical timeline and $1,411/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.1/10 in Shingle Springs, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Shingle Springs: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $36,033 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Shingle Springs

Trap · 3.6/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Shingle Springs's 4.8/10 is below the California state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 3.6/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can get a tenant out in Shingle Springs for non-payment?

Legally, the absolute fastest would be after the 3-day notice expires, they move out, and you take possession. However, if they don't move, you're looking at the full unlawful detainer process, which typically takes 281 days. There's no "fast track" if they fight it.

Q2

Can I just change the locks if a tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. That's an illegal "self-help" eviction in California and can lead to severe penalties, including fines and having to pay the tenant damages. You must go through the court system.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Shingle Springs?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly recommended to use an attorney for an eviction in California. The process is complex, and even small errors can lead to significant delays and costs. Given the average cost and timeline, a lawyer is an investment, not an expense to cut.

Q4

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I've served a 3-day notice?

Do not accept partial payment unless you're willing to withdraw the 3-day notice and start over if they don't pay the rest. Accepting partial payment can negate your notice, forcing you to issue a new one and restart the clock.

Q5

Is "cash for keys" legal in California?

Yes, "cash for keys" is legal and often a smart move. It's a voluntary agreement where you pay the tenant to move out. Always put the agreement in writing, specifying the terms, the amount, and that the tenant agrees to vacate and leave the property in good condition. Have an attorney review it.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.6/10 places Shingle Springs in the 68th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.