Skip to content
Myers Flat, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 69 residents

Myers Flat, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Humboldt County · Population 69

In 2026
Risk score
7.6
HIGH

32th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.4 Average4.3 Now7.6
8.9 2.4 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.6 1993 · score 3.6 1994 · score 3.7 1995 · score 3.5 1996 · score 3.5 1997 · score 3.6 1998 · score 3.6 1999 · score 3.6 2000 · score 3.6 2001 · score 3.6 2002 · score 3.6 2003 · score 3.6 2004 · score 3.8 2005 · score 3.9 2006 · score 3.9 2007 · score 4.0 2008 · score 4.7 2009 · score 4.9 2010 · score 5.1 2011 · score 5.1 2012 · score 5.2 2013 · score 5.2 2014 · score 5.2 2015 · score 5.2 2016 · score 5.3 2017 · score 5.3 2018 · score 5.5 2019 · score 6.3 2020 · score 8.9 2021 · score 8.5 2022 · score 8.2 2023 · score 7.9 2024 · score 7.9 2025 · score 7.7 2026 · score 7.6

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.0 Regional 7.0 State 6.8 Economic 5.2 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 5.5 Eviction 6.2 Tenant 1.0 Housing 4.5 7.6 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +28.4% (2024)
    7.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.0
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    37.0% poverty · 8.7% unemp.
    5.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,357 average · 46.5% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    36.8% of income on rent
    5.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    267 days filing → judgment
    6.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    46.5% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Myers Flat and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Myers Flat compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Humboldt County
Very Low
#35 of 39 cities
Rank in county, 11th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 39 cities in Humboldt County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Low
#1140 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 29th percentileLowHigh
#1140 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Myers Flat risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Myers Flat: 7.67.6Myers FlatThis cityCounty: 8.28.2Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.6
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.6/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 267d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,357/mo. A contested eviction takes 267 days and costs $15,013–$35,987 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 46.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 69 residents, 46.5% rent. 37% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 37.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7 and 7 (Dem margin +28.4% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.2, housing court bias 4.5, rent-control risk 5.5. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.2. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 37.0% poverty, 8.7% unemployment, 37% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Myers Flat sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 9.9 Los Angeles San Diego, CA · 277d · ~$25.9k all-in ($94/day) · score 8.7 San Diego San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.2 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Fresno, CA · 279d · ~$24.4k all-in ($88/day) · score 8.9 Fresno Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 9.2 Sacramento Long Beach, CA · 291d · ~$26.4k all-in ($91/day) · score 9.6 Long Beach Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Bakersfield, CA · 249d · ~$25.6k all-in ($103/day) · score 7.7 Bakersfield Anaheim, CA · 258d · ~$23.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 8 Anaheim Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Myers Flat
Myers Flat · 267d · ~$25.5k all-in ($96/day) · score 7.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Myers Flat, CA

Landlording in Myers Flat, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.6/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Myers Flat is a city of 69 residents where 46.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 36.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,357/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Myers Flat eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Myers Flat closes 267 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Myers Flat's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Myers Flat runs $15,013 to $35,987 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 267 days of typical timeline and $1,357/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Myers Flat, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Myers Flat: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $35,987 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Myers Flat

Trap · CALIFORNIA
Humboldt County court applies California statute uniformly. Filing fee, notice period, and trial-to-writ timeline are set at the state level. At 4.5/10 local risk, default judgment frequency is typical.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Myers Flat tenant tries to claim "retaliation" if I serve an eviction notice?

California has strong anti-retaliation laws. If you serve a notice shortly after a tenant complains about repairs or exercises other legal rights, they might claim retaliation. To avoid this, address repair requests promptly and document everything. If you must evict, ensure you have clear, documented just cause (like non-payment) that predates any tenant complaint. Always consult with an attorney if you suspect a retaliation claim might arise.

Q2

Can I raise the rent in Myers Flat?

Yes, but California's statewide rent control (AB 1482) applies. You can generally raise the rent by 5% plus the local CPI (Consumer Price Index), capped at 10% total, once every 12 months. You must provide proper written notice (30 or 60 days depending on the increase amount). Don't try to raise it more; it's illegal and can invalidate your lease.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Myers Flat?

Absolutely. Given the complexity of California law, the high costs, and the long timelines, attempting a DIY eviction is a huge risk. A single procedural error can lead to dismissal, forcing you to start over and costing you thousands more. Think of a lawyer as an essential investment to protect your property and income.

Q4

What if my tenant abandons the property?

Even if it looks abandoned, you can't just change the locks. California law requires a specific notice of belief of abandonment (Cal. Civ. Code § 1951.3). You must send this notice, and if the tenant doesn't respond within 15-18 days, then you can legally regain possession. Follow this process carefully, or you could be liable for wrongful eviction.

Q5

Can I charge a late fee in Myers Flat?

Yes, but it must be a "reasonable" estimate of the damages you incur from the late payment, not a penalty. Typically, this means a small percentage of the rent (e.g., 5-10%) or a flat fee. State the late fee clearly in your lease. Do not charge excessive late fees, as these are unenforceable in California.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.6/10 places Myers Flat in the 32nd percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.