Garnsey Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037124903 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,744 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tract 06037124903 sits in the Garnsey area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Severe burden reaches 38%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1666, -118.4009 · click any tract to drill in
Why Garnsey scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Garnsey compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 54%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 95%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 99%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Garnsey. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.2%Housing insecurity
- 6.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.3%Food insecurity
- 13.8%SNAP enrollment
- 8.1%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 27.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Garnsey
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
82% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Set annual rent against average income of $78,575 and the ratio lands at 32%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Cost burden runs 63% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Average gross rent is $2,112, 9% above the Los Angeles average. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 9.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037124903
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037124903?
What is the average rent in tract 06037124903?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037124903?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037124903?
Is tract 06037124903 considered part of Garnsey?
What share of households in tract 06037124903 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037124903 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037124903 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.