Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037273700 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,796 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Tract 06037273700 sits in the Golden Triangle area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.4/10. Population here is 2,796. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9984, -118.4527 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Triangle scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Golden Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 27%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 17%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 86%Grade C
- 6%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Golden Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.1%Housing insecurity
- 3.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.0%Food insecurity
- 6.9%SNAP enrollment
- 5.0%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 14.0%Frequent mental distress
- 21.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle
Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Average gross rent is $2,639, 37% above the Los Angeles average. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
16% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. roughly one in two of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Food insecurity runs 8.0% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 93rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely.
Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $135,766.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037273700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037273700?
What is the average rent in tract 06037273700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037273700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037273700?
Is tract 06037273700 considered part of Golden Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037273700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037273700 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037273700 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.