Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,043 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Los Angeles

Tract 06037500403 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,497 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 06037500403 sits in the Rose Hill area of Pico Rivera, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.8/10. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.2/10.

Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 1% Owners 98%
Tract context
Occupied units1,073
Renter share1.9%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate21.1%
Median income$86,134

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 10 tracts In Rose Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 15 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#1,680 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#3,885 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0104, -118.0604 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill scores 7.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
21.1% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$1,944 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
6.6

How Rose Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.87.8This tracttract 500403Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill

Cost burden runs 45% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.4/10. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Food insecurity runs 27.6% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 22.7% against 15.2% nationally.

It sits 0.6 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Average gross rent is $1,944, 9% above the Pico Rivera average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #9,043 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 2% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5/10.

Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $86,134.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037500403

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037500403?

Census tract 06037500403 in the Rose Hill neighborhood scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037500403?

Median gross rent is $1,944/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037500403?

21.1% of residents in tract 06037500403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,497.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037500403?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 51th, minority 96th, housing 40th.
Q5

Is tract 06037500403 considered part of Rose Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037500403 fall within Rose Hill (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037500403 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037500403 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037500403 scores 7.8/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037500403 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 5% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related