Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037143401 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,478 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 06037143401 covers part of the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,478. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1535, -118.4139 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Triangle scores 8.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 50
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 48%Racial/ethnic minority
- 63%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 76%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.0%Food insecurity
- 7.3%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle
Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
At $2,450 a month, rents run 27% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.8% against 11.3% nationally.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #5,413 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 5.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 53% of renters. It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037143401
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143401?
What is the average rent in tract 06037143401?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143401?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143401?
Is tract 06037143401 considered part of Silver Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037143401 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037143401 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037143401 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.