Village Green Eviction Risk: High

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. The 18 tracts inside this boundary do not behave alike. Individual scores run 6.4 to 9.9, a 3.5-point gap wide enough that the area average misleads on any specific address.

Severe burden reaches 31%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. On the high side is tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10.

Running hot is eviction-process difficulty at 9.3/10. Food insecurity affects 31.2% of adults, 13.4 points above the national rate.

The poverty rate is 17%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. 17.3% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt.

At $1,759 a month, rents sit 9% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Among the 161 mapped neighborhoods of Los Angeles, it ranks #67 by risk, the middle third. For a like-for-like read, Tujunga and Hollywood Dell score within a fraction of it.

Social vulnerability runs high at 8.4/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input. Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $74,710.

Underwrite the address, not the area: with 3.5 points between its best and worst tract, the per-tract table below is the operative number. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.