Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Virgil Village Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037195802 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,958 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037195802 in the Virgil Village area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 38% Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units1,091
Renter share76.3%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$89,890

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Virgil Village
Low
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#507 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#237 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0757, -118.2777 · click any tract to drill in

Why Virgil Village scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,876 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Virgil Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Virgil Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 195802Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Virgil Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Virgil Village

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

The severe-burden share is 26%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. This is renter territory: 76% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

50% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,876, close to the Los Angeles average. Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $89,890.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037195802

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037195802?

Census tract 06037195802 in the Virgil Village neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037195802?

Median gross rent is $1,876/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037195802?

15.0% of residents in tract 06037195802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,958.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037195802?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 39th, minority 87th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 06037195802 considered part of Virgil Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037195802 fall within Virgil Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037195802 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037195802 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037195802 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037195802 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related