Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

Claremont Eviction Risk: High

Tract 06037402001 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,043

Tract 06037402001 sits in Claremont, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8/10. Population here is 4,043. Severe burden reaches 45%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 22% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,420
Renter share52.0%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$76,136

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 tracts In Claremont
Very High
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#1,630 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#3,534 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#7,836 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.0873, -117.7243 · click any tract to drill in

Why Claremont scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claremont
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$2,098 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claremont
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claremont
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claremont
5.9

How Claremont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Claremont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 402001Claremont: 7.47.4Claremontparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Claremont

Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $76,136, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.2/10.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.3/10. Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.2/10. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 91st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 57% of renters.

It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely. Average gross rent is $2,098, close to the Claremont average. 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037402001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037402001?

Census tract 06037402001 in Claremont scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037402001?

Median gross rent is $2,098/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037402001?

16.2% of residents in tract 06037402001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,043.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037402001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 79th, minority 82th, housing 76th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037402001 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037402001 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037402001 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Claremont at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 06037402001 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related