Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

College Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Claremont

Tract 06037401801 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,467 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 06037401801 covers part of the College Park area of Claremont, CA, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,467. 27% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 19% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,591
Renter share26.5%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$158,189

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In College Park
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Claremont
Moderate
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#2,241 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#7,047 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.1146, -117.7081 · click any tract to drill in

Why College Park scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claremont
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,299 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claremont
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claremont
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claremont
5.9

How College Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
College Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 401801Claremont: 7.47.4Claremontparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within College Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in College Park

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.4 points. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10. Food insecurity runs 7.5% against 17.8% nationally. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.3/10.

Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #18,163 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $158,189, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037401801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037401801?

Census tract 06037401801 in the College Park neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037401801?

Median gross rent is $2,299/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037401801?

2.6% of residents in tract 06037401801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,467.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037401801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 37th, minority 69th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 06037401801 considered part of College Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037401801 fall within College Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037401801 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037401801 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037401801 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Claremont at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037401801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related