Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

College Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Claremont

Tract 06037402002 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,180 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

The Elevated-tier score of $1/10 for census tract 06037402002 reflects conditions in the College Park neighborhood of Claremont, California. On the national scale it ranks #20,019 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 72% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,783 monthly, set against $84,940 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 44% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 12% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,566
Renter share43.8%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$84,940

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In College Park
Very High
Within parent city
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 9 tracts In Claremont
High
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#2,147 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#6,078 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.0874, -117.7135 · click any tract to drill in

Why College Park scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claremont
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,783 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claremont
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claremont
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claremont
5.9

How College Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
College Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 402002Claremont: 8.08.0Claremontparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within College Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in College Park

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Claremont, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037402002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037402002?

Census tract 06037402002 in the College Park neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037402002?

Median gross rent is $1,783/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037402002?

8.8% of residents in tract 06037402002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,180.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037402002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 45th, minority 64th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 06037402002 considered part of College Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037402002 fall within College Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037402002 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037402002 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037402002 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of Claremont at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037402002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related