Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Claremont Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06037401802 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,590

Tract 06037401802 sits in Claremont, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6/10. The severe-burden share is 32%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 9% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,350
Renter share15.5%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$133,676

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 9 tracts In Claremont
Very Low
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#2,242 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#7,047 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#18,163 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.1143, -117.7285 · click any tract to drill in

Why Claremont scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claremont
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,310 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claremont
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claremont
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claremont
5.9

How Claremont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Claremont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 401802Claremont: 7.47.4Claremontparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Claremont

It sits 2.4 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.2/10.

Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 42% of renters here are cost-burdened. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.3/10.

Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.1/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037401802

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037401802?

Census tract 06037401802 in Claremont scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037401802?

Median gross rent is $2,310/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037401802?

4.7% of residents in tract 06037401802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,590.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037401802?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 69th, minority 68th, housing 60th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037401802 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037401802 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037401802 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Claremont at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 06037401802 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related