Census Tract · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally

Claremont Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 06037401802 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,590

Claremont anchors census tract 06037401802, which lands at 5.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 66% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 42% of renter households, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,310 monthly, set against $133,676 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score

3.5

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 9% Owners 84%

Tract context

Occupied units1,350

Renter share15.5%

SVI overall0.46

Poverty rate4.7%

Median income$133,676

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.1143, -117.7285 · click any tract to drill in

Why Claremont scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Claremont

5.9

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

4.7% poverty · this tract

1.2

Supply constraint

$2,310 rent vs county FMR

3.8

Rent control risk

Inherited from Claremont

8.2

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.9

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Claremont

7.3

Housing court bias

Inherited from Claremont

5.9

How Claremont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

19%Socioeconomic
69%Household composition
68%Racial/ethnic minority
60%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.7%Housing insecurity
3.9%Utility-shutoff threat
9.2%Food insecurity
7.3%SNAP enrollment
5.4%Transit barriers
5.1%No health insurance
13.3%Frequent mental distress
25.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Claremont

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Claremont, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 46th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037401802

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037401802?

Census tract 06037401802 in Claremont scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037401802?

Median gross rent is $2,310/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037401802?

4.7% of residents in tract 06037401802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,590.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037401802?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 69th, minority 68th, housing 60th.

What share of households in tract 06037401802 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037401802 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037401802 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Claremont at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037401802 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.