Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,393 of 84,120 nationally

Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach

Tract 06037576602 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,829 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 8.9/10, tract 06037576602 in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,829 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.

Risk score
8.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47% Stable renters 36% Owners 17%
Tract context
Occupied units2,834
Renter share83.1%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate11.4%
Median income$88,268

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 32 tracts In Cambodia Town
Very Low
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 112 tracts In Long Beach
Low
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#1,172 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#1,974 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7640, -118.1731 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cambodia Town scores 8.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.4% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$2,033 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Beach
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Beach
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5

How Cambodia Town compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cambodia Town risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.98.9This tracttract 576602Long Beach: 9.19.1Long Beachparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 40

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town

83% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.

Average gross rent is $2,033, 9% above the Long Beach average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #4,393 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 4.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 56% of renters. It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely.

Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $88,268.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037576602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037576602?

Census tract 06037576602 in the Cambodia Town neighborhood scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037576602?

Median gross rent is $2,033/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037576602?

11.4% of residents in tract 06037576602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,829.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037576602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 3th, minority 66th, housing 64th.
Q5

Is tract 06037576602 considered part of Cambodia Town?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037576602 fall within Cambodia Town (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037576602 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037576602 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037576602 scores 8.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Long Beach at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037576602 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related