Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally
Hamer Eviction Risk: Elevated , Placentia
Tract 06059011715 ·
Orange, CA · pop 7,296 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
06059011715 is a census tract in the Hamer area of Placentia, CA. It scores 6.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 7,296. 44% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%Stable renters 14%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units2,499
Renter share34.6%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$104,917
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80th percentile
#2 of 6 tracts In Hamer
High
Within parent city
50th percentile
#6 of 11 tracts In Placentia
Moderate
Within county
36th percentile
#393 of 613 tracts In Orange
Low
Within state
30th percentile
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Placentia and the region
Centroid at 33.8824, -117.8529 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hamer scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Placentia
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,303 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Placentia
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Placentia
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Placentia
6.5
How Hamer compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 34
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.1%Housing insecurity
4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
9.2%Food insecurity
7.0%SNAP enrollment
5.3%Transit barriers
5.5%No health insurance
14.1%Frequent mental distress
26.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hamer
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10.
Against Orange County at 51.8%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.6/10.
Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 81st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.1/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Orange County average of 7.0 closely. Average gross rent is $2,303, close to the Placentia average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059011715
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059011715?
Census tract 06059011715 in the Hamer neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059011715?
Median gross rent is $2,303/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059011715?
4.3% of residents in tract 06059011715 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,296.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059011715?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 33th, minority 60th, housing 57th.
Q5
Is tract 06059011715 considered part of Hamer?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059011715 fall within Hamer (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059011715 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059011715 compare to Placentia overall?
Tract 06059011715 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Placentia at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Placentia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Placentia
Top eight tracts in Placentia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.