Within neighborhood
60
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally
Hamer Eviction Risk: Elevated , Placentia
Tract 06059021810 · Orange, CA · pop 3,850 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 6/10, tract 06059021810 in the Hamer area of Placentia, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,850. Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 8%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,241
Renter share19.4%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate6.1%
Median income$127,375
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
30
th percentile
Low
Within county
24
th percentile
Low
Within state
23
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Placentia and the region
Centroid at 33.8843, -117.8351 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hamer scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Placentia
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.1% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$3,209 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Placentia
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Placentia
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Placentia
6.5
How Hamer compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 36
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 27%Socioeconomic
- 70%Household composition
- 62%Racial/ethnic minority
- 24%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hamer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.4%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.5%Food insecurity
- 8.6%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 6.1%No health insurance
- 15.7%Frequent mental distress
- 27.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hamer
At $3,209 a month, rents run 34% over what the rest of Placentia commands. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.5/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.6/10. Against the Orange County average of 7.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points.
Cost burden runs 57% here against 51.8% across Orange County. Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally. Nationally it ranks #18,163 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Annual rent works out to 30% of average household income of $127,375.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059021810
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059021810?
Census tract 06059021810 in the Hamer neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059021810?
Median gross rent is $3,209/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059021810?
6.1% of residents in tract 06059021810 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,850.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059021810?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 70th, minority 62th, housing 24th.
Q5
Is tract 06059021810 considered part of Hamer?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059021810 fall within Hamer (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059021810 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059021810 compare to Placentia overall?
Tract 06059021810 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Placentia at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Placentia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Placentia
Top eight tracts in Placentia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
8.3
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
7.7
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
7.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Hamer
6.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
6.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Hamer
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06059021821
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Hamer
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Related