Neighborhood · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally

Hamer Eviction Risk: Lower , Placentia

Tract 06059011717 · Orange, CA · pop 2,809 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 5.6/10, tract 06059011717 in the Hamer area of Placentia ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,809 residents. That is riskier than about 62% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 44% of renter households, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,625 a month against an average household income of $158,977 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.

Risk score

3.5

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 11% Owners 80%

Tract context

Occupied units879

Renter share19.8%

SVI overall0.41

Poverty rate4.4%

Median income$158,977

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Placentia and the region

Centroid at 33.9029, -117.8495 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hamer scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Placentia

5.9

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

5.5

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

4.4% poverty · this tract

1.1

Supply constraint

$2,625 rent vs county FMR

4.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Placentia

8.3

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.7

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Placentia

7.6

Housing court bias

Inherited from Placentia

6.5

How Hamer compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

19%Socioeconomic
83%Household composition
60%Racial/ethnic minority
37%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hamer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.7%Housing insecurity
4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
9.3%Food insecurity
7.4%SNAP enrollment
5.6%Transit barriers
5.5%No health insurance
15.2%Frequent mental distress
25.1%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hamer

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Placentia, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059011717

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059011717?

Census tract 06059011717 in the Hamer neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06059011717?

Median gross rent is $2,625/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059011717?

4.4% of residents in tract 06059011717 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,809.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059011717?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 83th, minority 60th, housing 37th.

Is tract 06059011717 considered part of Hamer?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059011717 fall within Hamer (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06059011717 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06059011717 compare to Placentia overall?

Tract 06059011717 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Placentia at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Placentia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Placentia

Top eight tracts in Placentia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.