Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,308 of 84,120 nationally
Hamer Eviction Risk: Elevated , Placentia
Tract 06059011718 · Orange, CA · pop 3,278 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 06059011718 sits in the Hamer area of Placentia, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.7/10. roughly one in four of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Orange County average of 51.8%.
Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units984
Renter share9.5%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate12.2%
Median income$125,909
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
70
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
47
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
37
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Placentia and the region
Centroid at 33.8939, -117.8480 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hamer scores 6.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Placentia
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.2% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$3,188 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Placentia
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Placentia
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Placentia
6.5
How Hamer compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 28
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 22%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hamer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.6%Housing insecurity
- 4.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.1%Food insecurity
- 9.3%SNAP enrollment
- 6.2%Transit barriers
- 6.3%No health insurance
- 15.6%Frequent mental distress
- 26.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hamer
Average gross rent is $3,188, 34% above the Placentia average. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.3/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.6/10.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 3/10. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Orange County average of 7.0 closely.
Annual rent works out to 30% of average household income of $125,909.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059011718
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059011718?
Census tract 06059011718 in the Hamer neighborhood scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059011718?
Median gross rent is $3,188/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 25% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059011718?
12.2% of residents in tract 06059011718 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,278.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059011718?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 66th, minority 54th, housing 22th.
Q5
Is tract 06059011718 considered part of Hamer?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059011718 fall within Hamer (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059011718 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059011718 compare to Placentia overall?
Tract 06059011718 scores 6.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Placentia at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Placentia; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Placentia
Top eight tracts in Placentia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
8.3
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
7.7
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
7.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Old Town Placentia
6.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Hamer
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06059021821
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Hamer
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Hamer
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Related