Within neighborhood
33
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,888 of 84,120 nationally
Lawrence Park Eviction Risk: High , Fruitridge Pocket
Tract 06067004401 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,846 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
With a score of 8.7/10, tract 06067004401 in the Lawrence Park area of Fruitridge Pocket, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,846. What pushes it up most is housing-court posture at 9.3/10.
Risk score
8.7
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,533
Renter share47.2%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate26.3%
Median income$61,443
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
81
th percentile
High
Within state
75
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fruitridge Pocket and the region
Centroid at 38.5312, -121.4507 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lawrence Park scores 8.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
26.3% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,621 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
9.3
How Lawrence Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 91%Socioeconomic
- 90%Household composition
- 84%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 38%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lawrence Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.5%Housing insecurity
- 13.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 29.1%Food insecurity
- 30.0%SNAP enrollment
- 15.2%Transit barriers
- 15.0%No health insurance
- 20.2%Frequent mental distress
- 38.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lawrence Park
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.2/10. SNAP participation runs 30.0% against 15.2% nationally. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.4/10.
Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.6 points. The poverty rate is 26%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Housing insecurity runs 23.5% against 14.2% nationally.
Average gross rent is $1,621, 10% above the Fruitridge Pocket average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
On the national scale it lands near the 94th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067004401
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067004401?
Census tract 06067004401 in the Lawrence Park neighborhood scores 8.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067004401?
Median gross rent is $1,621/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067004401?
26.3% of residents in tract 06067004401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,846.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067004401?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 90th, minority 84th, housing 87th.
Q5
Is tract 06067004401 considered part of Lawrence Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067004401 fall within Lawrence Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067004401 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067004401 compare to Fruitridge Pocket overall?
Tract 06067004401 scores 8.7/10, higher than the parent city of Fruitridge Pocket at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06067004401 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fruitridge Pocket
Top eight tracts in Fruitridge Pocket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related