Within neighborhood
33
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,663 of 84,120 nationally
Lawrence Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Fruitridge Pocket
Tract 06067004402 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,282 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 06067004402, home to 4,282 residents in the Lawrence Park neighborhood of Fruitridge Pocket, scores 6.9/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 94th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
58% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,222 a month against an average household income of $58,302 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 49% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,326
Renter share48.8%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate26.3%
Median income$58,302
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
88
th percentile
High
Within state
87
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fruitridge Pocket and the region
Centroid at 38.5324, -121.4603 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lawrence Park scores 7.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
26.3% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,222 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
9.3
How Lawrence Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 97
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 98%Household composition
- 89%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 52%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lawrence Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 27.8%Housing insecurity
- 16.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 36.2%Food insecurity
- 37.7%SNAP enrollment
- 18.6%Transit barriers
- 19.1%No health insurance
- 21.1%Frequent mental distress
- 41.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lawrence Park
What moves this score most is housing court bias at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067004402
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067004402?
Census tract 06067004402 in the Lawrence Park neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067004402?
Median gross rent is $1,222/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067004402?
26.3% of residents in tract 06067004402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,282.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067004402?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 98th, minority 89th, housing 75th.
Q5
Is tract 06067004402 considered part of Lawrence Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067004402 fall within Lawrence Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067004402 struggle to pay rent?
About 27.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067004402 compare to Fruitridge Pocket overall?
Tract 06067004402 scores 7.7/10, lower than the parent city of Fruitridge Pocket at 8.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06067004402 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fruitridge Pocket
Top eight tracts in Fruitridge Pocket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related