Alamo Square Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075016400 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,162 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
06075016400 is a census tract in the Alamo Square area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 9.3/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,162. Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 15% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7751, -122.4370 · click any tract to drill in
Why Alamo Square scores 9.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Alamo Square compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 9%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 91%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 38%Grade C
- 28%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.7%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.6%Food insecurity
- 6.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.3%Transit barriers
- 4.4%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 19.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Alamo Square
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10.
Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. This is renter territory: 85% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Average gross rent is $3,003, 21% above the San Francisco average.
Food insecurity runs 7.6% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 6.1% against 15.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 8%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 3.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06075016400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075016400?
What is the average rent in tract 06075016400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075016400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075016400?
Is tract 06075016400 considered part of Alamo Square?
What share of households in tract 06075016400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075016400 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075016400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.