Tract 06075017101 ·
San Francisco, CA · pop 4,250 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
With a score of 8.9/10, tract 06075017101 in the Cole Valley area of San Francisco, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,250. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Risk score
8.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%Stable renters 51%Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units1,776
Renter share66.3%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate4.9%
Median income$200,357
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#5 of 5 tracts In Cole Valley
Very Low
Within parent city
14th percentile
#209 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within county
16th percentile
#204 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within state
78th percentile
#1,974 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7657, -122.4461 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cole Valley scores 8.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.9% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,908 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5
How Cole Valley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
2%Socioeconomic
5%Household composition
47%Racial/ethnic minority
83%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
33%Grade B
67%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cole Valley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.8%Housing insecurity
3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
5.4%Food insecurity
4.2%SNAP enrollment
4.0%Transit barriers
3.3%No health insurance
13.4%Frequent mental distress
18.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cole Valley
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. Cost burden runs about a quarter here against 37.3% across San Francisco County.
This is renter territory: 66% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Disability prevalence runs 18.0% against 31.5% nationally. At $2,908 a month, rents run 17% over what the rest of San Francisco commands.
Housing insecurity runs 5.8% against 14.2% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $200,357, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06075017101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075017101?
Census tract 06075017101 in the Cole Valley neighborhood scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06075017101?
Median gross rent is $2,908/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075017101?
4.9% of residents in tract 06075017101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,250.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075017101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 5th, minority 47th, housing 83th.
Q5
Is tract 06075017101 considered part of Cole Valley?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075017101 fall within Cole Valley (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06075017101 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06075017101 compare to San Francisco overall?
Tract 06075017101 scores 8.9/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06075017101 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.