Parkside Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075033001 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,075 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
06075033001 is a census tract in the Parkside area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 9.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,075. 6% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the San Francisco County average of 37.3%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7405, -122.4908 · click any tract to drill in
Why Parkside scores 9.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Parkside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 40%Socioeconomic
- 26%Household composition
- 81%Racial/ethnic minority
- 40%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 7%Grade A
- 91%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Parkside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.6%Food insecurity
- 6.4%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 4.8%No health insurance
- 12.1%Frequent mental distress
- 22.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Parkside
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10.
Average gross rent is $3,501, 41% above the San Francisco average. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. SNAP participation runs 6.4% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 9.6% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.7/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06075033001
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075033001?
What is the average rent in tract 06075033001?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075033001?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075033001?
Is tract 06075033001 considered part of Parkside?
What share of households in tract 06075033001 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075033001 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075033001 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.