Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally

Parkside Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075033001 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,075 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

06075033001 is a census tract in the Parkside area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 9.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,075. 6% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the San Francisco County average of 37.3%.

Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 13% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,373
Renter share14.3%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$162,379

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 10 tracts In Parkside
Elevated
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#149 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#153 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#1,536 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7405, -122.4908 · click any tract to drill in

Why Parkside scores 9.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Parkside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Parkside risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.2This tracttract 0330019.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Parkside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Parkside

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10.

Average gross rent is $3,501, 41% above the San Francisco average. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. SNAP participation runs 6.4% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 9.6% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.7/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075033001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075033001?

Census tract 06075033001 in the Parkside neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075033001?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 6% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075033001?

7.8% of residents in tract 06075033001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,075.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075033001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 26th, minority 81th, housing 40th.
Q5

Is tract 06075033001 considered part of Parkside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075033001 fall within Parkside (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075033001 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075033001 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075033001 scores 9.2/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075033001 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related